I deleted it due to the reaction but it is this sort of ongoing crap that was the reason I think we have been crazy to play this out in public. Personally really can’t be arsed with hearing this crap about 2013 and ADUG, Aabar, Etisalat, the royal family, the politics of the Middle East for another 12 months. Der Spiegel still have the keys - that is a problem.Ok my comment was extreme but on the opposite side of ‘happy clapping’ you stated on Twitter how we should have settled. I just felt that was giving an overly false impression to those that might look up to your good knowledge.
This was what I was alluding to earlier in the thread. Its one thing a newspaper publishing a set of documents they argue is in the public interest, but surely it's another thing to drip feed them with a view to maximising sales?
Unfortunately the law in this area is weak and very opaque. A very basic summary is that effectively, until it’s challenged and new case law and precedent is set, the media can pretty much hold onto stuff for as long as they like as long as they can reasonably claim they might need it for future stories
I don’t think that works for holding on to someone else’s document cacheThey'll reply that it's in the public interest and that Pinto is a whistle blower, not a criminal. It's the fallback line of every journalist.
He's going at the end of the season anyway KazCan we take DS down ?