Forzacitizens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 5,126
Re: Cesc Fabregas
Imagine the gooners...
Imagine the gooners...
Ray78 said:tolmie's hairdoo said:There have been some interesting developments last couple days.
Fabregas is open to City.
I'll leave it there and run for the hills.
That, and I don't have anything else to expand upon.
Sagna and Fernando hope to be announced early next.
.
Year? ;).
Better, like who? pogba, vidal and barkley no chance because both would require vast sums of money.LoveCity said:Fabregas' record against City (x2), Real Madrid (x2) and Atletico Madrid (x4) last season: 0 goals, 0 assists and most notably subbed off in 7 of those 8 games after largely ineffective performances.
I watch Barca (and both Madrids) most weeks and he strikes me as a flat track bully, shining when they beat someone like Valladolid 6-0, but then doing nothing in the biggest games.
Koke would be a much better signing for us if we wanted a versatile midfielder who can play in different positions. Fabregas has been living too much off his reputation, padding his stats against cannon fodder, and the fact that after so much maneuvering and controversy in trying to re-sign him, Barca are now desperate to flog him when he's in the prime years of a footballer, should set off a few alarm bells.
He'd be a 'good' signing but not a necessary one, IMO. As I said, a luxury signing... we could do better.
tolmie's hairdoo said:There have been some interesting developments last couple days.
Fabregas is open to City.
I'll leave it there and run for the hills.
That, and I don't have anything else to expand upon.
Sagna and Fernando hope to be announced early next.
.
Really? He's a nasty sob IIRC.sam-caddick said:Bottomless_Sailor said:To play where though?MCC said:Can only see him going back to Arsenal if he moves.
I could see Chelsea.
I don't see him going to Chelsea, he isn't a Mourinho player in my opinion.
Arsenal need to priotize a striker or two, a defensive midfielder, a right back and arguably some better central defensive cover before they think about adding to their already immense set of midfielders.
If we didn't have FFP sanctions I reckon we would have had him snapped up by now but you never know.
bluemcr said:Better, like who? pogba, vidal and barkley no chance because both would require vast sums of money.LoveCity said:Fabregas' record against City (x2), Real Madrid (x2) and Atletico Madrid (x4) last season: 0 goals, 0 assists and most notably subbed off in 7 of those 8 games after largely ineffective performances.
I watch Barca (and both Madrids) most weeks and he strikes me as a flat track bully, shining when they beat someone like Valladolid 6-0, but then doing nothing in the biggest games.
Koke would be a much better signing for us if we wanted a versatile midfielder who can play in different positions. Fabregas has been living too much off his reputation, padding his stats against cannon fodder, and the fact that after so much maneuvering and controversy in trying to re-sign him, Barca are now desperate to flog him when he's in the prime years of a footballer, should set off a few alarm bells.
He'd be a 'good' signing but not a necessary one, IMO. As I said, a luxury signing... we could do better.
Id rather have barkleytolmie's hairdoo said:There have been some interesting developments last couple days.
Fabregas is open to City.
I'll leave it there and run for the hills.
That, and I don't have anything else to expand upon.
Sagna and Fernando hope to be announced early next.
.
tolmie's hairdoo said:There have been some interesting developments last couple days.
Fabregas is open to City.
I'll leave it there and run for the hills.
That, and I don't have anything else to expand upon.
Sagna and Fernando hope to be announced early next.
.