i8rags
Well-Known Member
In time we will be the only club from Manchester to win the champions league, that's if they let us in it.baldybouncer said:In time, we probably both want what one another's already has!
In time we will be the only club from Manchester to win the champions league, that's if they let us in it.baldybouncer said:In time, we probably both want what one another's already has!
Skashion said:Yes, it is, undoubtedly. One of the best managers in the world with one of the most stable and and domestically-dominant sides has only managed it twice out of eighteen attempts. I don't even know how many attempts there must have been by London clubs at winning it but to suffice to say there'll be dozens, and yet only one win. I would swap Champions League trophies for league trophies without a second's hesitation.Stoned Rose said:The CL is harder to win than the premier league????!!!!!
The CL has just been contested by the second best team in Germany and the sixth best in England. Neither entered the competition as reigning champions of their own country. With it being 'cup' based it's open to the best/most deserving team not always winning. You can avoid better teams depending on how the draw pans out.
The prem rolls over 38 games, you play everyone twice. There is none of this 'two legs' and 'away goals' bollocks. It's miles harder to come out as top dog under those circumstances than under CL circumstances.
And to top it off City slapped both Bayern and Chelsea at home this season.
Won it three times since 2005/6. I do not call that luck. I do not call Mourinho's ability to consistently do well in it luck - surely this is one of the reasons you wanted him over Mancini, a proven league winner. Sure there's more luck in it than a full league system but there's nowhere as near as much as luck as you are pretending as there is a mini-league system with home and away legs and then two legs all the way to the final. Most great teams will beat another lesser team across two legs.SWP's back said:You have absolutely just proven my point with that comment. Barcelona have been the best club team the world have ever seen for 5 years and won the CL twice in that time.
The CL is harder to win but is rarely won by the best team their own country that season, let alone in Europe as winning it is not solely down to ability but also luck. Far more so than a league season. As for your "its not won by teams in Turkey etc" no it isn't, well spotted. The seeding and group stage sorts that out, leaving 16 half decent teams, just about any of which could then win it.
The Premier League will always carry more prestige with me. As stated, I'd take it over Europe every year.
Won it three times since 2005/6. I do not call that luck. I do not call Mourinho's ability to consistently do well in it luck - surely this is one of the reasons you wanted him over Mancini, a proven league winner. Sure there's more luck in it than a full league system but there's nowhere as near as much as luck as you are pretending as there is a mini-league system with home and away legs and then two legs all the way to the final. Most great teams will beat another lesser team across two legs.SWP's back said:You have absolutely just proven my point with that comment. Barcelona have been the best club team the world have ever seen for 5 years and won the CL twice in that time.
The CL is harder to win but is rarely won by the best team their own country that season, let alone in Europe as winning it is not solely down to ability but also luck. Far more so than a league season. As for your "its not won by teams in Turkey etc" no it isn't, well spotted. The seeding and group stage sorts that out, leaving 16 half decent teams, just about any of which could then win it.
The Premier League will always carry more prestige with me. As stated, I'd take it over Europe every year.
gordondaviesmoustache said:I presume you mean geology.chesterbells said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Yesterday didn't represent a seismic shift in the tectonic plates of football.
Last Sunday did.
LOL, cliche ahoy! FFS, Is this a geography lesson?
Having said that I agree with you.
Sorry if my use of metaphors is a little hackneyed for your liking