Chelsea thread 2018/19

[goalmole]

Here you go:

Regardless of the existence of this rule, you can't run a team where the players are making the strategic decisions. The whole thing implodes.
Might as well not have a manager.

 

[goalmole]

He’s gone as soon as they get a replacement.

If that doesn't happen then he needs to do a Mourinho and set the team up to lose every game till they do.

 

[nmc]

If that doesn't happen then he needs to do a Mourinho and set the team up to lose every game till they do.

You are forgetting Maureen renegotiated his contract to get more compensation - he had all the angles covered.

 

[BlueTG]

All this talk, and all that money. He’s a fucking bang average keeper anyway.

 

[blueinsa]

All this talk, and all that money. He’s a fucking bang average keeper anyway.

Lettuce leafs for wrists as far as i can see.

Bang average.

 

[Chevelle]

 

[Machiavelli]

What’s this?

 

[dennishasdoneit]

Well he certainly didnt play Sarriball on Sunday. Traditional Italian solid defence and trying to nick it it on the break was his game.

Perhaps understandable given his side let in 6 the last time they faced us..?

 

[dennishasdoneit]

Regardless of the existence of this rule, you can't run a team where the players are making the strategic decisions. The whole thing implodes.
Might as well not have a manager.

There was nothing he could do.
He could not enter the field of play and physically haul the player off.
If anything,the Chelsea captain should have quickly weighed up the situation and acted accordingly .
Blaming the manager ,in this instance,is showing complete disregard for the reality of the situation,given the laws of the game.

 

[Dubai Blue]

Regardless of the existence of this rule, you can't run a team where the players are making the strategic decisions. The whole thing implodes.
Might as well not have a manager.

Doesn't change the fact that the referee had no power to force Kepa to go off, which is the point I was replying to.