You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chelsea Thread | 2024/25
- Thread starter Vialli98
- Start date
jimharri
Moderator
Not sure I could see Neto going with that. He's got a mixed injury record, hasn't he?Only thing I think of why the are and can buy so many players maybe they have a very low basic wage but if they play a full game they get treble of there basic wages or more
kunaguero10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2009
- Messages
- 7,245
Tosin is a weird signing, he’s not a youngster annymore and is not (as likeable as the lad is) of the quality to propel them back into the top 4 IMO. He’d sort of lost his place in the Fulham team hadn’t he?
His agent (who is his brother) must be doing a hell of a job. Guess he was a free and he’s obviously worth several million in today’s market.
His agent (who is his brother) must be doing a hell of a job. Guess he was a free and he’s obviously worth several million in today’s market.
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 3,801
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
2 Full 11 a side games in training, right there.
( ok, so some of the keepers would have to play out, but you get the point)
( ok, so some of the keepers would have to play out, but you get the point)
Tosin is a weird signing, he’s not a youngster annymore and is not (as likeable as the lad is) of the quality to propel them back into the top 4 IMO. He’d sort of lost his place in the Fulham team hadn’t he?
His agent (who is his brother) must be doing a hell of a job. Guess he was a free and he’s obviously worth several million in today’s market.
Got him on a free so play him a bit then flip him and make 10m
If this is true it's nuts and a terrible loss of money for Chelsea.
Arsenal are allegedly in for Mudryk. Remember they were gazumped by Chelsea who paid £89m for him in Jan 2023.
Apparently Arsenal could get him 18 months later for around £35m!!!
Arsenal are allegedly in for Mudryk. Remember they were gazumped by Chelsea who paid £89m for him in Jan 2023.
Apparently Arsenal could get him 18 months later for around £35m!!!
Their yank owner does know it’s Soccer not Grid Iron. You don’t need a 53 man roster. Defence and offence are on pitch at same time. They must be haemorrhaging cash and long May it continue.
If this is true it's nuts and a terrible loss of money for Chelsea.
Arsenal are allegedly in for Mudryk. Remember they were gazumped by Chelsea who paid £89m for him in Jan 2023.
Apparently Arsenal could get him 18 months later for around £35m!!!
We didn’t pay £89m. We paid £62m with £25 in addons like ballon d’Or and title wins, things he currently has no hope of activating.
So if it is true that Arsenal are willing to pay £35m, I’d take it and run. It’s just over half what we paid, if they can get us out of this Mudryk jam, I’d be grateful.
kippaxwarrior
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 22,378
- Location
- Jupiter Mining Corporation Red Dwarf
- Team supported
- City of course!!
I watched a fans pre season preview on YouTube a couple of days ago and the Chelsea supporter said she and a lot of Chelsea fans are completely pissed off with the owners as they are refusing to interact with the supporters.We didn’t pay £89m. We paid £62m with £25 in addons like ballon d’Or and title wins, things he currently has no hope of activating.
So if it is true that Arsenal are willing to pay £35m, I’d take it and run. It’s just over half what we paid, if they can get us out of this Mudryk jam, I’d be grateful.
She claimed supporter groups have tried to contact the hierarchy about the finances, players ect and the owners are point blank refusing to speak to them. How true is this?