Chelsea Thread | 2024/25

Cellarite said:
I'm certain that Paul Ince didn't join City on loan. I stand to be corrected but he was one year into his Middlesbrough contract at that point and we were in the Championship.
Click to expand...
I don't think he did either - I posed the question to AI and that's what it came up with, a load of tosh.


Capture.PNG
 
Gazza said:
I don't think he did either - I posed the question to AI and that's what it came up with, a load of tosh.


View attachment 129136
Click to expand...
You've baffled me with that. If AI told me that Cantona played for City, I'd just KNOW he didn't. I certainly wouldn't let AI dupe me into posting that he did on bluemoon.

Erm...sniff sniff.
 
Vialli98 said:
He is arguing that finding a loophole is basically cheating when by definition a loophole wouldn't be a loophole if it was outside the rules. I'm not sure how you're meant to reason with that, unfortunately.
Click to expand...

Selling assets to a group company to increase profits to meet FFP and then claiming it's not against the rules, it's just a loophole is akin to a thief saying they haven't broken into a house if the door is unlocked.
 
waspish said:
It's probably all been going on under arbitration, difference is there is no snide **** leaking anything.
Click to expand...

It doesn't get to an independent panel until allegations have been referred to the disciplinary process, which would have to be announced. My guess is they will agree a settlement before that happens with a points deduction and some sort of squad limitations (yes, I know). Presumably before the City case to set some sort of precedent.
 
Cellarite said:
You've baffled me with that. If AI told me that Cantona played for City, I'd just KNOW he didn't. I certainly wouldn't let AI dupe me into posting that he did on bluemoon.

Erm...sniff sniff.
Click to expand...
Er...... OK
 
halfcenturyup said:
Selling assets to a group company to increase profits to meet FFP and then claiming it's not against the rules, it's just a loophole is akin to a thief saying they haven't broken into a house if the door is unlocked.
Click to expand...

Is it a loophole if the PL had already investigated and judged an identical case with a different club a few years ago and approved it, deeming it fair and within the rules?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.