BTH said:
There have been a lot of posts on this thread - many from people who weren’t involved in any of the City fanzines - so let me put a few people straight on a few things albeit in abridged form...
In the beginning there was BluePrint. I acknowledged early on that they had unlocked the door and given some of us at least the idea.
Unfortunately, BluePrint seemed to be staffed entirely by social workers and right-on pseudo-intellectuals who had some quaint ideas, including offering the club £1,000 to have blue and white netting in the goals. That was fair enough as it went; it was their money. However, things took an about-turn when they decided that we – Electric Blue at the time– should be doing something similar. We weren’t. Any meagre profits we made in the early days were banked and paid for sundry items (typewriter ribbons and Letraset amongst other things). We had a big fallout with holier-than-thou BluePrint because of this.
Dave Wallace was someone I had a great relationship with for many years. We sometimes socialised together and he was good enough to give me a lift to a lot of games. I appreciated that, enjoyed his company and paid my way. It was mutually beneficial in my opinion.
However, following an editorial meeting when we’d realised that Dave was planning to be the fan on the board, I asked him about this. He was uncharacteristically vague, saying that he was reluctant but: “everyone wanted him to do it.” I found this a bit hard to believe as I hadn’t heard anyone else say this, but he didn’t actually admit that he was interested. Had he done so, I would have supported him; I didn’t want the job personally. Certainly, had he asked me to support him I would have had absolutely no qualms in doing so.
Subsequent issues of his fanzine saw writers promoting Dave as FOTB. One of them – someone I knew well and respected – said a fanzine editor should do the job, before comparing Dave and I and coming up with the conclusion that because they sold more than me and my ex did, therefore Dave should be FOTB. I wasn’t happy about being put into a frame that I had made no pretensions of being in, only to be relegated to second place.
I wrote to Dave several times subsequently and – whatever some of his supporters think – unlike me (check out the back catalogue for proof), Dave abhors criticism, however constructive or well intended it may be, and simply refused to print my letters.
Consequently and admittedly, I had a few pops to “deflate his bubble of pomposity” and I tried to be at least humorous but – rightly or wrongly – things turned nasty.
For what it’s worth, we met up some time ago and buried the hatchet. Too much water’s gone under the bridge for me to bear any malice and I’m too busy with other things, but one day I’m sure someone – perhaps Gary James? – will write a book about the so-called ‘fanzine wars.’
Personally, I am proud to have been part of what might be called a cultural phenomenon and I recognise that everyone else who was involved had a part – however large or small – to play in what was a part of City’s off-the-field history in what, for most part, were the darkest of days.
Virtually all of the fanzines have gone now and never a week goes by without someone asking me to bring another Bert Trautmann’s Helmet out, but Dave soldiers on. Personally I think he likes the limelight a little too much to ever return to the rank and file, but good luck to him anyway, and his writers too.
Fairplay Noel for at least shedding some light on the "fanzine war"!!
I loved your publications (Electric Blue & BTH) but equally enjoyed the initial BluePrint and definately KotK.
It's a shame (in a way) that you and Dave Wallace had a falling out as essentially, you were both promoting, championing, reporting and providing fantastic insight and opinion (back the day, long before this easily available internet nonsense) on a cause which all of us have in common, which is CITY.
Only you and he will ever know the true facts of what went on (and that is your perogative) but I do agree with you and always felt that Dave tried to always play the martyr in this situation, suggesting that you, Noel, were a bit of a bully (not my opinion, by the way!!)
On the other hand.......and for all the abuse that Dave Wallace receives..... I doubt that there are many City fans who, if offered the option of becoming a "fan on the board", would turn the opportunity down??
Alongside that, and there may be others who know differently, but IF the media contacted any of us, I doubt there are many of us who would refrain from giving an opinion??
I don't want to go down the road of comparing now and then as they are infinately miles apart, but........... they WERE good times off the pitch!! The football would occassionally provide some entertainment/good results, but City's fanzines definately captured the period and embraced them to a quality level.
In these fast moving times, I, for one, find it VERY reassuring that the "golden era" of (our) fanzines are remembered so fondly
A credit to you, Noel, and anybody who has made a contribution to any City fanzines, back when typewriters were in fashion, trips to printers, letters/contributions from individuals were heavily relied upon and it wasn't merely a case of sitting in front of a monitor, on a readily available, home PC (as I am now!!)
** Give us a playlist, for nostalia's sake, Leon Yelyab.... ;o)