Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
The thing is he doesn't need a test to confirm he's indeed a dope.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City fined £35,000 for anti-doping admin error
- Thread starter domalino
- Start date
dronefromsector7G
Well-Known Member
Rio was unavailable for comment.Has Wio had is say on this , no doubt he could teach our club how to dodge a dope test.
inchy14
Well-Known Member
Has Wio had is say on this , no doubt he could teach our club how to dodge a dope test.
Yes, he had all the mirrors removed from his house.
B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
I blame Brexit
quiet_riot
Well-Known Member
The way this was announced at first I thought you had a player who had failed a doping test... Pretty misleading reporting really.
Cynics will say they did that on purpose to tar us.
Me? I say they did that on purpose to tar us - knowing 99% of the population only reads headlines.
Newquayblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 793
Totally agree - the point, for me, is the reckless reporting --- nothing new there then....snakes!The way this was announced at first I thought you had a player who had failed a doping test... Pretty misleading reporting really.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
The Guardian has published a little more detail and it gets worse, although we'll probably only get a £25k fine. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ter-city-doping-test-charges?CMP=share_btn_tw
It seems that on three separate occasions we had incorrect information on at least 5 squad members when testing staff turned up. 5 is apparently the trigger point for the FA so they do allow some leeway. But if that's true and on three occasions we've had incorrect information for 5 or more players then someone wants shooting, despite the over-sensational headlines.
It seems that on three separate occasions we had incorrect information on at least 5 squad members when testing staff turned up. 5 is apparently the trigger point for the FA so they do allow some leeway. But if that's true and on three occasions we've had incorrect information for 5 or more players then someone wants shooting, despite the over-sensational headlines.
quiet_riot
Well-Known Member
The Guardian has published a little more detail and it gets worse, although we'll probably only get a £25k fine. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ter-city-doping-test-charges?CMP=share_btn_tw
It seems that on three separate occasions we had incorrect information on at least 5 squad members when testing staff turned up. 5 is apparently the trigger point for the FA so they do allow some leeway. But if that's true and on three occasions we've had incorrect information for 5 or more players then someone wants shooting, despite the over-sensational headlines.
I imagine someone will be getting a written warning, or a P45 on Monday morning.
Aye but isn't the benchmark for "being in the wrong place" pretty much as small as being in a first team training session instead of in the gym with the reserves. From what I read it sounded incredibly pettyThe Guardian has published a little more detail and it gets worse, although we'll probably only get a £25k fine. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ter-city-doping-test-charges?CMP=share_btn_tw
It seems that on three separate occasions we had incorrect information on at least 5 squad members when testing staff turned up. 5 is apparently the trigger point for the FA so they do allow some leeway. But if that's true and on three occasions we've had incorrect information for 5 or more players then someone wants shooting, despite the over-sensational headlines.