You can also support City and be objective about the judgmentThe rather obvious point you miss is that you can support City and be objective about redtop biased media coverage and City's victory in this case. (see page 901 btw)
You can also support City and be objective about the judgmentThe rather obvious point you miss is that you can support City and be objective about redtop biased media coverage and City's victory in this case. (see page 901 btw)
If you get in bed with the devil.Stefan Borson talking about United Covid 19 and Jim's shares fees and fudging £75million to get around PSR, He was slapped on the back of the hand by talkSPORT and made him retract his statement in what he said because United complained, A couple of days later on talkSPORT he's saying United did Nothing Wrong hahahaha
I think you have lost me here Stefan. Tariq Panja is not a trusted source. Few people have published more distorted stories about City. Even the story you re-tweeted is a very selective and disingenious version of events. During the UEFA case Panja was one of the main outlets of leaks which were designed to damage City. Some of those leaks were accurate and some were false. But they were all part of a smear campaign against City. By re-tweeting what he publishes you are endorsing his content.No I retweeted it as an important counter balance to the other briefing.
I am not backing down from my position because....
get this
I ACTUALLY BELIEVE IT HAVING READ THE DECISION.
Yep, well aware of that, but when he’s on here he’s in essence a blue who’s also a lawyer. Humility is a good trait.What are you expecting? He's a lawyer ....
And that is the entire point, it is HIS considered view and that is all, the fact that he chooses to use an appalling excuse of a radio station which has in the past employed stan collymore and mark goldbridge and currently employs gabby agbonlahor and martin keown to voice that opinion somewhat reduces the veracity of that opinion. I get he is a blue and he knows his onions but that does not make him infallible and his opinions above reproach with the best will in the world if a respected surgeon decided to express his medical opinion in the beano you would have to question why.
You could sort of understand if City were winning the league by 15-20 points every season, but we have provided the football world and the PL itself with more frequent and exciting title races and final days than had previously ever been seen in English football history.How can so few at the Premier League, fuck something up that is good for so many people, that the competition no longer has any credibility ?
They have essentially conspired with a select few clubs to cheat, basically.
As long as the select few were alright, they turned a blind eye to them and restricted the growth of others.
They must have been taking advice from that twat Tebas.
I said to an Everton fan last night, that there would only be City left in the top division because the rest of the cheating cunts will be relegated.
He hasn't "rubbished" Martin Samuel, just suggested that he has gone slightly OTT with some of his comments.
Know and am what? If you can't see your own connection I'm afraid I can't help.I know and I am - not really sure what your point has to do with the criticism of Stefan on here though
He has rubbished him, called his article complete nonsense!He hasn't "rubbished" Martin Samuel, just suggested that he has gone slightly OTT with some of his comments.