City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[BerkshireBlue]

Not read it but are you saying the judges who have just done this case ruled our sponsorship was over valued

surely the didn't have the remit to judge on this anyway. It's pretty irrelevant to the case

 

[Inter Me Nan]

Missed this - what did he say?

Nothing funny.

 

[cleavers]

Or is "inbetween" identities.

I think you mean pronouns....

 

[we-r-the-big-4]

have you got a link to it as I can't find one and i'd like to read all of it, one or two pages that everyone is quoting seems to brush things under the carpet somewhat

I found a link with the Mag if you are still looking

 

[BerkshireBlue]

I found a link with the Mag if you are still looking

yeah still looking

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

I get what you're saying, but he's absolutely not on there to defend City or fight our corner.

He's on there to try and debunk some of the legal jargon, so that the average Joe can go away with a certain level of understanding.

I think he's sat on the fence throughout his Talksport debates, aside from saying that the 115 charged will be incredibly difficult for the PL to prove hold any water.

He is still doing a great job, however, of reaching out to those of us with some form of intelligence, who are able to just about grasp how difficult this case is to judge.

Unfortunately, the above isn't your average Talksport listener, and they just label him as a City fan boy, and ignore the majority of what he says.

My take, is that there is that much information about, that Stefan has now become part of a small group of people that I listen to; albeit I take it all with a fair small pinch of salt.

@tolmie's hairdoo has been on the money in a lot of what he has fed us, albeit I appreciate that @slbsn information is more an experienced opinion rather than information he's been fed.

I think Stefan is a legal expert and generally does a great job simplifying what is a very complex issue. I don't epect him to be a cheerleader for City but I took exception when he promoted a tweet by Tariq Panja who is not a reliable source for reasons well documented on here. The legal nuances are important but sometimes they are overtaken by other issues like the information and PR battle. The public perception of who won this case is important for our reputation whatever the legal nuances are.

 

[york away to this!]

How I yearn for those bygone Saturday nights in The Ritz.

Hence your username, I assume?...

 

[we-r-the-big-4]

yeah still looking

Sent pm

 

[Scaley]

This is the Ritz you're talking about. Not even John Merrick would get that many knockbacks.

True dat.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Missed this - what did he say?

No idea I don't find him funny at the best of times. So I don't watch him.