crystal_mais
Well-Known Member
I hope the next time the British Government start lobbying the UAE & Saudi Arabia for investment in the UK they tell them where to go.
That reminds of people today who always answer a question with the word "So".
Always seems like they're buying some time to find the right answer
or 14 yank owners tabling a vote on 'no relegation'On that basis he would have no issue with the PL abolishing FFP, PSR and APT rules given they did not exist at the time our owners came in.
It was mentioned on here by Prestwich Blue.I think they probably tried this and City refused to take anything less than being fully cleared. The PL couldn’t clear us without losing face so have taken their chances with the tribunal.
It is all entitled attitudes and obsessive self-interest mateThey are desperate to keep there cartel in tact and think they have the moral high ground.
I wonder if they would have the same issues if the Red Cartel clubs had our owners. As I predicted a long time ago, the Premier League will eat its self.
Extra: as per slbsn it’s just posturing by the media for the clubs anyway, as a club cannot Sue another one, as per the PL’a own rules (ironic).
That is not beyond imaginationor 14 yank owners tabling a vote on 'no relegation'
:p
The Telegraph article was pure fantasy. Gutter journalism based purely on what story would get fuming red cartel suporters beating their chests….a fantasy piece about them taking legal action against City……bingo….watch the clicks add up !How can a club 'sue' City before they know the outcome.
I think it would be a ‘notice to sue’ or whatever the legal term is. It’s to do with the companys act statute of limitations. You have to notify of intention about something that is <6 years old, that will happen >6 years period.How can a club 'sue' City before they know the outcome.