This gets more complicated- I thought the panel had issued their full judgmentThere is a second part of the panel's award to be published.
What is the second part related to? Compensation for City? Or an appeals process- or something else?
This gets more complicated- I thought the panel had issued their full judgmentThere is a second part of the panel's award to be published.
To discuss what? I’m a numbskull because I didn’t realise either :-) :-)I don’t think the numbskulls of the press realize that the panel is still sitting.
It has to be one of the clubs where shareholder loans are a major factor, so Everton, Brighton or possibly Arsenal. My guess would be Bloom at Brighton, although given Everton's parlous financial state you could also look at them.which chairman??
I think it is to give more clarification of what needs to be done and, if City and the PL can’t decide costs and or compensation, to rule on that too.To discuss what? I’m a numbskull because I didn’t realise either :-) :-)
That was the exec who started the whole ATP ball rolling five days after the Newcastle takeover with his "stop the Gulf states" email.Rumoured Brighton, allegedly
Free advertising? Sounds like a breach of APT or FFP or whatever. Cue a 15 year retrospective investigation (or retroactive if you're in Thailand).
The average PL fan has been brainwashed into thinking an owner that wants to invest money in his club is "bad", and billionaire owners with no sporting ambition whatsoever only using a club as a way to make themselves even richer (usually at the clubs expense) is "good". It's just jealousy combined with some xenophobia.We are only deemed evil for two reasons.
* Having a vastly superior business model I.e. not American
* Being hugely successful as a result
This gets more complicated- I thought the panel had issued their full judgment
What is the second part related to? Compensation for City? Or an appeals process- or something else?