City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[brazilians hurt]

Presumably shareholder loans will now have to be included within the APT rules, with a commercial rate of interest being applied from a PSR perspective.

Could well be the biggest victory for us if so.

That how I’m reading it

 

[69FACUPfinal]

Two cases won, don’t forget the CAS case

Let's go for our second ' Treble' then....

 

[cheekybids]

Who’d’ve thought the three red shirts would be involved?

Spurs must have got the message when Joe Lewis found himself in the dock.

 

[standupifyouhatemanu]

SSN Kaveh Bollockoff actually saying it how it is after MCFC legal victory who the fuck would have thought that !

And he actually said there is no portion of the ruling that the premier league could consider a victory

 

[oakiecokie]

View attachment 134187

Suck on that you load off cheating bastards.
USA 0 v 1 Dirty Oil Arabs.

 

[Sheikh rattle and roll]

Everton were one of the clubs being witness for us

That’s not my point
My point is Burnham is the mayor of Mcr not Merseyside he just happens to be an Everton season ticket holder
He was quick enough to write to the Govt objecting to Everton’s points deduction
However he governs Mcr not exactly been supportive of our cause despite the money we pump into the area

 

[paulchapo]

Fucking wonderful. That should apply to debt too, as in the rags. It's ludicrous they're allowed to operate owing so much money.

 

[Dukefan9]

Our Rodri replacement war-chest just got a bit bigger I think

 

[69FACUPfinal]

Puts Arsenal in the shitter apparently, £200m in shareholder loans that could see them breach PSR.

Oh please, please let this come to pass and how delightful that will be when the day of reckoning comes for that shower of US owned shite.

Pass me the letterheaded paper to write to them when there is a fire sale and we can offer to take the 'camera man' Odegaard and that inappropriately named mutt WIN for starters.....

 

[bluetonium]

Just reading through the finding now in a bit more detail (I mean, what happens on the pitch is nothing compared to the excitement of these courtroom battles, eh?) and, I have to say, I can't read this any other way than we absolutely wiped the floor with them. They have to literally go back and increase value they placed on two city sponsorship deals.

There is no other way to read it. We won every major point it seems.

They've not followed their own rules. Those rules were discriminatory and were specifically applied in an unfair and discriminating way to Manchester City. They've reached competition law.

Ignore the bbc trying to get a punch in with things like city didn't win all their arguments, they're already on the canvas and the court has been completed, they just don't know it yet.

Whilst we should absolutely treat the '115' case separately, this can't hurt either. How inept have they been to suggest something so obviously in violation of the law? And this was supposed to be a refinement of the previous rules which they want to do us under. Plus, revaluing those two sponsorship deals.... They may not be relevant at all to the other case but again, if these are shown to have been regarded incorrectly by the self appointed authority, even discriminatory, then I bet the others reek of it also.