halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,373
Fair enough, that's all I was trying to understand. Thanks.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Fair enough, that's all I was trying to understand. Thanks.
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
His sources on CAS were simply impeccable.
Kippax Street 1880
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 5,333
Not having a pop at Slbsn as he stands up for the club and the fans regularly. But just like Big Steve, who's involved with Neville and Carragher via Overlap, and the Rag, Coach Wreckers, and Gooner Youtubers, there are certain red shirt pundits, Red Shirt fans, and media outlets you shouldn't get involved with, who have an agenda against City, no matter what you get offered.
I don't mind Steve doing it as he has an absolute gift for shit talking he wipes the floor with them.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
The problem with Panja is that in the past he has been fed false information by bad actors. A lot of his doomsday content was shown to be untrue at CAS. He does have senior sources at MUFC and LFC but some of the leaks have been malicious and untrue. Panja has been happy to publish with no wider context.I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
JRockBlues
Well-Known Member
The problem with Panja was that he aligned himself with the WhatsApp muppets early on in the UEFA charges kerfuffle and wouldn't entertain any other view. The fact that his paymasters had links into FSG was purely coincidental as well I'm sure.The problem with Panja is that in the past he has been fed false information by bad actors. A lot of his doomsday content was shown to be untrue at CAS. He does have senior sources at MUFC and LFC but some of the leaks have been malicious and untrue. Panja has been happy to publish with no wider context.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Make me a fool once, I'll laugh.The problem with Panja was that he aligned himself with the WhatsApp muppets early on in the UEFA charges kerfuffle and wouldn't entertain any other view. The fact that his paymasters had links into FSG was purely coincidental as well I'm sure.
Try and do it again & again, you can fuck right off.
Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 18,993
He has good sources but he had Benjie Mendy “guilty” on numerous counts of rape / sexual assault. Obviously, Mendy was acquitted of the charges (by jury).I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
Regarding the APT case. Even if the Prem have won the bulk of the case that seems quite likely, Panja dismissing the database issue could be a bit misleading. Databases tend to be built to support business objectives, rather than be stand alone resources. I think it’s unlikely that the panel would have deemed the database to be wrong / unlawful without finding a flaw in the underpinning policy. We don’t know fo sure as we haven’t seen the ruling.
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
All true and fair but it's also worth considering that he's a jumped up bitter **** who hates our club and every single thing connected to it
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Most of the info leaked to Panja has been designed to damage City. It has been biased and distorted. He has presented it as fact when he knows full well the motive of those who have leaked it. That is fundamentally dishonest.All true and fair but it's also worth considering that he's a jumped up bitter **** who hates our club and every single thing connected to it
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
I used to know a person who told lies most of the time.Most of the info leaked to Panja has been designed to damage City. It has been biased and distorted. He has presented it as fact when he knows full well the motive of those who have leaked it. That is fundamentally dishonest.
I never found a reliable way to decide which was which when he spoke.