Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,580
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Thank you sir.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Thank you sir.
MMA
Well-Known Member
Given Bishops rant against us if anybody wants tickets to his tour....
" SWPs backs " mate looking up the tour dates.. ;-)
G-Star Medium Rare
Well-Known Member
Lovely jubley. Not only have the PL been using rules which were illegal, they are now demonstrably lying per our lawyers. What a good week for City!
Spot on with janga.He already started misleading rest of the members regarding yesterday result , this con man is digging his grave with every move he makesThink it will be janga for Masters .
Fucking hard from stopping the blocks falling away .
Only to the minority I hope.
I’m not quite sure what some Blues was expecting from Stefan.
Maybe they wanted him doing the Poznan on talkshite.
He’s always been measured and cautious in his approach not just on talkshite but on here also.
Funny how rival fans take shots at City as we’ve become more successful only for a minority of our fans to do exactly the same thing when a poster becomes popular on this forum due to their postings and insight.
Stefan and Tolmie being two prime examples of that.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,606
Boost their expenditure not income or certainly not income that counts toward PSR, I think it's important to note. It's important because we also increase our expenditure via equity investment, again it can't be considered in respect of PSR...... Those teams have a also been able to rely upon financial loans to boost their income...
What part of “for now” did you struggle with, lol?
You are the master, mate, of posting an article we’ve been discussing for hours on here. Told you before, there’s about a 5 minute window before it’s on here, hahaha. Always gives me a chuckle that you think you’re bringing breaking news to the forum!
I’ve only just caught up. Some of us have been working since 5am.
I bring lots to this forum, not just breaking news. :-)
But is it fizzling out? Of course it isn’t. Current page 1221.
3 unlawful needs spot light and i’m really interested how they are going to handle this shit show.
‘All Void’ yes, but not ‘all unlawful’.Our general counsel Simon Cliff today stated that in the clubs opinion all of the APT rules are void and have been since 2021.
So it matters not a fuck if it's one two or twenty if the clubs position is correct.
And besides the panel’s release doesn’t say it was all unlawful.
It’s one word that you missed, that you seem to be wanting to play ‘gotcha!’ with the surrounding quote. Even spending time (albeit quickly with Google), locating the ‘offending’ quote from the past - which is to be applauded, fact checking - but still missing the nuance of ‘all’.
As previously mentioned , it’s bizarre, Slbsn was on TS before/during the release of City’s press statement, but you seem to want him to have had prior knowledge of the content or the way things were panning out in private since City & the PL were privately informed of the hearings results. He’s not got those deep contacts (afaik), that the excellent @tolmie's hairdoo and certain journalists have with City.
What are you wanting slbsn to come out with? Opinions based on hope and desire , or opinions based on the publicly known facts of the time?
Edit: just seen Ric’s post that arrived between reading Rabby post and my reply. Sorry. I’ll shut up on the subject.