This is the problem we face. Dishonest hit pieces like this turn the tide further against us. We should sue the Times for the blatant lies in this
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
This is the problem we face. Dishonest hit pieces like this turn the tide further against us. We should sue the Times for the blatant lies in this
red 2 hats
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 2,168
Good, want to see that slimey scouse **** Parry squirm, he's been a major player in trying to fuck us over, you reap what you sow, you treacherous bindipping rat
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 27,445
Nope. Just demonstrating our capability.is this us going "nuclear"?
Last edited:
I sympathise with your point of view but I’m not sure Micah is the answer :)
He was an example.
But, however much we might not think he's a great pundit, he's the most high profile ex-City player that we have in the UK media.
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 7,910
- Team supported
- Manchester city
God help us.He was an example.
But, however much we might not think he's a great pundit, he's the most high profile ex-City player that we have in the UK media.
So in a nutshell will we bring a end to the Premier league as we know it now.
No that's just what the usual suspects in the media are trying to paint it as.
In reality we're just bringing a legal case against a new amendment to a rule introduced in February.
That's it.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,503
- Team supported
- Manchester City
The Micah thing was an example.
just a very ill-judged one imo
Fuck suing them.Are City able to sue them or anything?
Where’s the fucking charges!!!??
Nope didn’t think so.
BlueMoonz1977
Well-Known Member
Jesus just had a brief skirt over of the responses on X for that matt lawton piece, every single reply has not a fucking clue what it is all about. They all seem to think it shows we are guilty of the 115 charges
Just goes to show that the average football fan are total morons and believe 100% everything the press write
I find it very ironic that the likes of liverpool fans who fought against the press that wtote lies about their club can now believe them tooth n nail - but then again they own certain media dont they so they can spin the narratives
Just goes to show that the average football fan are total morons and believe 100% everything the press write
I find it very ironic that the likes of liverpool fans who fought against the press that wtote lies about their club can now believe them tooth n nail - but then again they own certain media dont they so they can spin the narratives
Of all the people, both former players and non players, he could have picked and he picks Micah. Is that a clue that he's on the wum?
He's the most high profile ex-City player in the UK media.
He's regularly on sky sports, the BBC and the top football podcasts in this country.
I don't think he's a great pundit but he's supposedly a City ambassador, so if not him to help our case in the media, then who else?