Centurions
Well-Known Member
The B(lue) side?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 3,936
In almost every case i would agree, but one member let confidential information slip, the PL may punish all members by suspending the distribution of all information pertaining to this case. Probably not in the rules but since when have the rules stopped the PL.The other members have to be informed at least, so the chances of not even one out of 19 other clubs not opening their mouth is not happening.
I know i keep saying it but the accusations are so serious the PL can not afford to lose any part, or even be seen to compromise on any.
Last edited:
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 3,936
Because in this case a CFG player was transferred to another CFG and the cartel media decided the price, which did not happen. Generally i find believe him until he is wrong, so you can believe him in this case. :)Isn't this site social media, if so how can we believe you?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 9,616
In almost every case i would agree, but one member let confidential information slip, the PL may punish all members by suspending the distribution of all information pertaining to this case. Probably not in the rules but since when have the rules stopped the PL.
I know i keep saying it but the accusations are so serious the PL can not afford to lose any part, or even be seen to compromise on any.
Surely City would be given the result at the same time as the premier league.
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 3,936
My view only, i was told it would be like a court case, with both giving evidence but to a panel. so both the PL and City would be there. City have asked for costs, but would that come in the form of money? and the parts they fail on, City could be charged with bringing the game into disrepute. So while i think the case is done, there is a lot of bartering still to be done.Surely City would be given the result at the same time as the premier league.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 9,616
My view only, i was told it would be like a court case, with both giving evidence but to a panel. so both the PL and City would be there. City have asked for costs, but would that come in the form of money? and the parts they fail on, City could be charged with bringing the game into disrepute. So while i think the case is done, there is a lot of bartering still to be done.
The club bringing the game into disrepute would be the club that leaked details to the media.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,734
The premier league need to start opening their eyes and wake up.
Alvarez going to Athletico , Bellingham and mbappe going to Real.
The Saudis poaching top players
The rules they are putting in to restrict PL clubs could ruin the brand in 2 years
My old boss used to tell me it takes many generations to create a successful luxury brand, but it only takes one to ruin it. The same clearly applies to football. And it is no coincidence it's the generation dominated (one way or another) by American owners.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,734
In almost every case i would agree, but one member let confidential information slip, the PL may punish all members by suspending the distribution of all information pertaining to this case. Probably not in the rules but since when have the rules stopped the PL.
I know i keep saying it but the accusations are so serious the PL can not afford to lose any part, or even be seen to compromise on any.
Are we talking about the club's claim against the PL here? I don't see anything particularly serious about any of it. If certain parts of the APT rules are found to be incompatible with competition law, they will be amended. If the club has incurred losses as a result, they can claim damages. If the rules are compatible with competition law, they will stay.
That's it. There will be no charges of bringing the game into disrepute for challenging the legality of certain rules.
All imho, of course.
It was more of general statement criticising that people think that this site is a notch above social media - it isn't, if you're not sure just spend a couple of hours in the off-topic section.Because in this case a CFG player was transferred to another CFG and the cartel media decided the price, which did not happen. Generally i find believe him until he is wrong, so you can believe him in this case. :)
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,734
It was more of general statement criticising that people think that this site is a notch above social media - it isn't, if you're not sure just spend a couple of hours in the off-topic section.
It's a notch above other social media for us because it's a City supporting echo chamber for the most part. As you say, stray out of the City "safe zone", and it quickly becomes apparent that people here have more opinions than IQ as well for the most part.
Not knocking Bluemoon or the rest of social media, or the people on here, btw, it's just life.