City linked with Guus Hiddink

NQT said:
The press are at Hughes big time today. There's also mention of our owners wanting Wenger and details of the dressing room bust up

The press have never bothered the owners before. Why should they do so now?

I don't particularly like Hughes. I think the performances have shown he's not good enough as does our league placing.

When you're failing with players like Adebayor / Tevez in your team then there's summat wrong there.
 
Marvin said:
SamTheGuru said:
I have a feeling Hiddink is coming....
If Hughes was to be sacked, there are only 2 appointments which would be acceptable to most City fans

a) Hiddink
b) Mourinho

and Hiddink has just been ruled out, and Mourinho's Inter are in the draw for the Champions League today, and have the Serie A to go for. Mourinho is possible in the Summer but not now

So can we put a stop to this Hughes Out Now stuff, because it's not going to happen?

No? Thought not.

I dunno you know if we got someone like Roberto Mancini in he ticks a lot of boxes.

He's 45 (A young manager everyone wants),
He's won four Coppa Italia (Equivilent to 4 FA cups at 3 different teams),
He's won 3 League titles aswell,
He's champions league experience,
He is supposedly improving his English as he wants to come to England.

Now i don't know about you but I'd be happy to get someone like that to come to city and give them time as he has a pedigree of being a winner. I know the Italian league isn't what it used to be but its still a dam good league.
 
if there is the slightest hope that we can get hiddink in, i just hope we dont fuck about like we seem to have done with everything else and get him in now.

lets salvage something from this season before it runs away from us and the excuses start.

We need to get rid of what is fast becoming a shambles at our football club and retain some dignity and put the smug critics back in their place. when we were shit i could handle people laughing at us but i'm bored of the piss taking now.

Is it too much to expect when our team has been expensively assembled with current international players?
 
vans0531 said:
Mark Hughes's future at Manchester City has entered a critical period as he battles to convince the club's owners over the next few weeks that he remains the manager to realise their long-term vision.

The City manager is again under scrutiny following Wednesday night's meagre offering at Tottenham Hotspur, where a 3-0 defeat to fellow Champions League hopefuls left the club languishing eighth in the Premier League. This comes amid reports that the former Chelsea manager Guus Hiddink has been approached by City's chief executive, Garry Cook, about taking over in the summer.

Hiddink's agent, Cees van Nieuwen-huizen, told the Telegraph: "He [Cook] asked me if it would be worthwhile having a meeting to discuss the future and what might happen next summer. But I told him Guus was contracted to Russia."

City have now won one, lost one and drawn eight of their last 10 league matches and despite receiving unequivocal support from the chairman, Khaldoon al-Mubarak, and the club hierarchy in the past, Hughes is under renewed pressure to oversee an upturn before the January transfer window.

City face Sunderland, Stoke City and Wolverhampton in their final league fixtures of 2009, a trip to Middlesbrough in the FA Cup third round on 2 January and then the Carling Cup semi-final with Manchester United. The prospect of guiding the club to its first major final since 1981 can be presented as evidence of tangible progress by Hughes, who appeared to have revived City's season only a fortnight ago with victories over Arsenal in the Carling Cup and Chelsea in the Premier League.

City's owners, however, have higher ambitions for the season following an outlay of £118m on new players last summer – notably a sustained challenge for Champions League qualification – despite their acknowledgment that there will be inevitable dips in the rebuilding process.

Hughes confirmed following the defeat at White Hart Lane that he intends to return to the transfer market in January and the next few games are seen as key to retaining the confidence – and financial support – of his employers in Abu Dhabi.

The performance against Spurs represented a severe setback to those aims, while Gareth Barry's admission last night that the players were "at each other's throats" in the dressing room afterwards would not have gone down well either. "There is a minimum requirement in terms of work-rate and effort and we didn't have a platform to be able to get into people's faces and close people down," the City manager conceded. "We don't profess to be the finished article and that was shown. We have a big game at the weekend and it is important we get back on track."

The former Wales and Blackburn Rovers manager has overhauled City's football operation since Sheikh Mansour bought the club in 2008 and there is reluctance among the owners to start anew. Equally, they also want evidence that City can compete in one of the most open Premier League seasons for several years.

Hughes's task has not been helped by untimely injuries to defenders, the latest being the knee problem that has sidelined Joleon Lescott for between six and eight weeks. The England international underwent surgery in London on Wednesday to remove a piece of bone that came loose when he hyper-extended his knee during the 3-3 draw at Bolton Wanderers last Saturday. Lescott joins Wayne Bridge in the treatment room, with the left-back also out for six weeks with a knee problem, and with Kolo Touré bound for the Africa Cup of Nations next month the City manager hopes to reinvest in January.

"We will see what's out there," said Hughes, who also has Nigel de Jong suspended for the match with Sunderland tomorrow. West Ham United's Matthew Upson and Neven Subotic of Borussia Dortmund are among the possible candidates for a new City central defender.

The Eastlands club have a game in hand on the four teams immediately above them in the Premier League and Barry, Hughes's first expensive recruit for this season, admitted there is plenty of scope for improvement on the side's showing at White Hart Lane. "We are very disappointed and we are really hurting in the changing room and the lads were really at each other's throats," he said.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/dec/18/mark-hughes-manchester-city" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009 ... ester-city</a>

I notice there are no dates in this article as to when Cook supposedly asked the question.
 
MANCHESTER City have no plans to bring Guus Hiddink to the club, despite reports in Friday's papers that they had contacted his agent.

Blues boss Mark Hughes is under pressure after Wednesday night’s 3-0 defeat at Tottenham left his side eighth in the Premier League.

City have won one of their last 10 league matches, although eight of those games have been draws.

Russia manager Hiddink has linked with a role at Eastlands, along with Roberto Macini, Jose Mourinho and Arsene Wenger.

Hiddink’s agent Cees Van Nieuwenhuizen is good friends with City chief executive Garry Cook, and the pair do speak regularly.

But M.E.N. Sport understands that the Blues have no plans to bring Hiddink to the club in any capacity.

Van Nieuwenhuizen has also made it clear that Hiddink – who had a spell in charge at Chelsea last season – is happy in charge of Russia.

Hiddink plans

When asked if he has spoken to the English club’s chief executive Garry Cook, the agent said: “Yes, I did.

“But Guus is happy with Russia. Definitely. I had a call because I have been working with Garry for 12 years since we worked together at Nike.

“But I have received calls from all over the world about Guus. There has also been an approach from Juventus.

“He (Cook) asked me if it would be worthwhile having a meeting to discuss the future and what might happen next summer. But I told him that Guus was contracted to Russia.

“I said I didn’t think it was worth having a meeting. Guus is very relaxed.

“He starts his holiday tomorrow and in January there are elections for a new president for the Russian Federation.

“He is contracted until next summer but there is an offer for him to stay for two more years, and I think he will definitely stay.”

Van Nieuwenhuizen claims City did not go into detail regarding a potential role for Hiddink, adding: “I don’t know because I said it was not worth discussing it because Guus was happy.”

Reports suggest Hiddink, who guided Chelsea to an FA Cup win as interim manager in the second half of last season, is prepared to consider his future in February

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1186666_city_have_no_hiddink_plans" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... dink_plans</a>

So Guus is out of the picture then, How about Mancini then ?.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.