zola said:
Pablo1 said:
zola said:
Listen to yourself you're saying how you had to put up with "Gloating gloryhunting rags" can you not see how many of you are turning into the same thing you used to despise. If you actually read what I have written and not just gone all defensive/abusive you'd see I'd not said anything particularly bad.
But you're not talking about the points that originally riled a few of us up are you? You came on and told us that we were getting things all our own way and had been lucky with referee decisions, then when having been asked to explain the ones that had gone against us you decided to change tac and go down the 'you're as bad as your neighbours' nonsense. Come on, you can do it, even if you think I'm wrong at least let me sleep tonight having got an answer from you. Thanks
So are you saying that of all what Mourinho said the only thing that riled you was that you've had the rub of the green lately ? Not so bad then.
Don't watch you close enough to comment on 90 minutes of every game to know about every decision can only see the ones highlighted and they went your way at key moments.
Perhaps some were debatable but they fell your way, that's football, when other refs wouldn't have given them the key being is they happened at game changing times.
You're still missing the point, bud. Most of the decisions went against us in the Spurs match. Let's go through the littany:
- Clear penalty when Bentaleb virtually caught the ball (juggled it like an England slip fielder) => not given
- Zabaletta completely up-ended on the edge of the box - NO CALL
- Adebayor lunges his body in front of Demichelis and sticks his foot on his body => Demichelis gets booked
- Aguero clouted in the face by Dawson => NO CALL
- Capoue stamps violently on David Silva's foot => No card of any colour.
The only arguable decision that went in our favour was the penalty that was given. And the video evidence shows it was a close but a correct decision. But if the other ones had been adjudged correctly, then we would likely have been out of sight by then so the Rose decision would have been irrelevant.
I understand you don't watch every minute of our game - but then you shouldn't automatically believe your manager is speaking gospel truth. He has an agenda the same as any other manager.
Btw, I'd still like your explanation of the double-injury time when you played West Ham.<br /><br />-- Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:46 pm --<br /><br />
We'reNotReallyHere said:
---------------Hart-------------
Zab---Kompany--Nastasic--Clichy
--------Yaya-----Fern-----------
Navas--------Jovetic-------Silva
------------Negredo------------
I'm fairly sure he will select Dzeko alongside Negredo as they did nicely in Aguero's absence previously. Also Kolarov in place of Clichy. Clichy had a good game against Spurs, but Kolarov has been a devastating attacking threat out on the left wing, especially at home, and I fancy him to unpick Chelsea's defence here.
