Re: City Ladies
*Retweet*
-- Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:37 pm --
*Retweet*
Rascal said:The arguement that money spent on the Womans team could be used to reduce SC prices is just a non arguement.
Do the people argue that money spent on the new academy should be used to reducd SC prices too?
The club are building for everyone, for Manchester and for men and women and thats a real positive in my book.
Also its simple if you dont like the ladies team ignore it and let us who have boughf into the idea enjoy it.
*Retweet*
-- Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:37 pm --
Chris in London said:Rascal said:The arguement that money spent on the Womans team could be used to reduce SC prices is just a non arguement.
Do the people argue that money spent on the new academy should be used to reducd SC prices too?
The club are building for everyone, for Manchester and for men and women and thats a real positive in my book.
Also its simple if you dont like the ladies team ignore it and let us who have boughf into the idea enjoy it.
Speaking for myself rasc, I haven't bought into the idea of a ladies team. I bought into the idea of Manchester City football club. I did it more than 4 decades ago.
Fat old blokes who weren't very good for us 20 years ago get my unconditional support provided they represent a City veterans team. 9 year old lads who probably won't be on our books in 5 years time get my support when they parade around the ground. Pre-season friendly sides full of players we are looking to ship out on loan get my unconditional support.
City teams, in short, get my support irrespective of their gender or quality.
I find it a little surprising that some posters dismiss any city team on grounds of either quality (given where we were not so long ago) or gender.
*Retweet*