Club Badge (merged)

2hchocl.jpg
15y927t.jpg


If the above is the actual design it's different from the snip it city have released.
On the snip it above, the blue band on the shield is the opposite way around. From the red petal you have blue banding before the gold?

I think you're right, if that is indeed part of the badge which City have released, then it doesn't seem to correspond with the one from the ipo.
 
2hchocl.jpg
15y927t.jpg


If the above is the actual design it's different from the snip it city have released.
On the snip it above, the blue band on the shield is the opposite way around. From the red petal you have blue banding before the gold?

This is what confused me about the leak, it was a completely different style to the teaser campaign. I would've expected them to use the same style for the ads as the badge, that style being similar to the NYCFC branding.

I can hope anyway...
 
Yes it is curious. If it is upside down, the border is a bit different. City do like to tease though... All is to be revealed later on.
 
It doesn't really matter though does it George

Whether we were a direct follow on from Ardwick/St Marks, the fact remains that 1894 was when Manchester City were formed..that in itself is completely correct
The whole point about publishing your founding date is to emphasise a long and hopefully distinguished history. To pick a later date by reference to a particular title is not the way it is done by any other club. Consequently we fail to do justice to the continuity of our traditions and supporters compared to our competitors. Bizarre and unjustifiable in my view.
 
The dark blue border in the corner is closest to the Rose yet on the leaked badge it shouldn't be there at all
I don't think the teasers are close ups of the actual badge, I think they are just showing elements of it, to give you an idea of what to expect. If that's the case, then everything they've showed us so far matches up to the leaked badge
 
I don't think the teasers are close ups of the actual badge, I think they are just showing elements of it, to give you an idea of what to expect. If that's the case, then everything they've showed us so far matches up to the leaked badge

If that is the case, then it's a bit daft giving us a 'teaser' of something which doesn't exist, but you could well be right.
 
Regarding our new badge, that bird on talkshite has just told us to prepare to be disappointed. So that's that then.
 
Right the date will always be contentious but both dates are parts of our history, and peopel will never agree which we use (personally 1880).

Buth shirley we can mainly all agree thank the maker that we have clipped the eagles wings and we wont have to have it on our gear much longer
 
Can some please summarise why there seems to be this much disappointment with the leaked badge? Is it frustration at it not being perfect or do people genuinely think it's shit?

It's genuinely shit.

But I think the frustration is that it's so close to being great. All the elements are there and in the right places. But it seems to have been designed on Microsoft paint by a child for his under 10s school team.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top