I miss all the fun.From the Guardiola thread. I've blocked the one's who got me banned so onwards and upwards from here. Ta...(cash or cheque for the username?)
I miss all the fun.From the Guardiola thread. I've blocked the one's who got me banned so onwards and upwards from here. Ta...(cash or cheque for the username?)
I am loathed to say it but I went over to the darkside of sad cafe to see if they are taking the piss and they are all praising it as stylish urrgh! anyway someone had mocked this up and I feel dirty even posting something fruom there but
the quality control guy needs his eyes testing, the 18 and 94 arent aligned properly.
Yep. This should be the oneNotthing is better than this
Mate, thanks very much for that. Ok so clearly, it's too sketchy to tell. Scum use the earliest that they can whereas we go with the conclusive which is the name change. We're directly evolved from those clubs and can trace our lineage to them but we aren't them. We're like the sons of St.Marks. For that reason I wouldn't even bother with a date at all on the badge but in terms of football across Europe, it shows we're older than most and have an older history than these 'history rich' elitist cunts like Bayern Munich. I can see why they've done it so I guess I'm ok with it now.http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/1894-v-1880.317619/page-2
you might find an answer on here ?
Yet they've crammed a shield, the 3 rivers, the ship, 1984 and a rose into it but adding "Football Club" is the line?
This is the debate though, define: formed. Did we just change our name to Manchester City or we're we distinctly formed separately from the Ardwick, Gorton line?
Would be good if @Gary_James could give us his opinion? What's his handle on here?