You’re looking at it too simplistically. What 1894 have said is that they don’t plan to move with the current proposals.
You’re trying to make the point that the club is giving us this perfect opportunity, but the reality is that it’s not perfect. They’re lumping hospitality sections in the key areas of the stand. They’re only putting 3k rail seats in stretched across the back and down the sides. They aren’t committing to a pricing policy. They aren’t adding new affordable season cards.
Atmosphere is not important to them.
It could easily be the perfect opportunity handed to us on a plate. But the priority is match day revenue (which is fair - but it’s not going to move me from SSL1).
Was reading that and thinking, see now there is a reasonable take. Not one I fully agree with, but reasonable, and I get it.
Then it got to your 'atmosphere is not important to them line', and it all fell apart. Because the club have repeatedly said it is, based designs and the build around that, and continue to say it. Lying bastards, right!
You having an opinion of what you want to see in the stand is all great. Might even be right. You deciding the group won't move, all good too. Both hardly up for debate.
But the minute you throw that bit of innuendo conjecture in, it muddies your own point, and invites this type of reaction from me, and others btw. And becomes you vs the club.
How do you not see the optics of that, including in 1894's statements? I annoyed a few by saying it earlier, but I also genuinely can't understand that you guys can't consider that point openly.
To me you and the club have different takes on what makes an atmospheric end. That's all. But both want the same. On top of that, the club are balancing fanbase variety, financial sustainability, and longevity of the stand with that.