Coronavirus (2021) thread

[Bill Walker]

Apart from your unfeasibly large testicles?

And penis.

 

[hilts]

Oopsie again.



#ex-gammon

If he weren’t dead I think he would be feeling rather foolish right now.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Apart from your unfeasibly large testicles?

 

[BlueAnorak]

If we have the supply, why are we not doing this in the millions per day?

We did 409k today.
The answer is the NHS has difficulty running a piss up in a brewery. Agile it isn't

 

[Quad]

I cant think of anyone I would want to see study it and pass comment than a 'science guy'. That is what they are for. who on earth would you prefer to do it?

Like the science guys have never get it wrong all the time with prediction about cases and deaths

 

[Quad]

Yeah, makes sense.

I think that if they’d communicated it better. Ie We have a new variant that looks like a super-spreader and we don‘t yet know the virulence of it yet, so we are asking people to be cautious and only go out where necessary whilst we gather the relevant information. This gives us the best chance of having the most normal Christmas we can possibly have.

I think people would have been on board with more.

This is bang on everyone I know says the same

everyone I know says it’s pretty much like a broken record

 

[Deleted member 77198]

Like the science guys have never get it wrong all the time with prediction about cases and deaths

Scientists don’t make predictions based on their own knowledge and opinion; they forecast what might happen going off past data. They can only use past data and the results can only come from that data. Their own expertise doesn’t come into it.

If the forecast doesn’t fit with the real world occurrences, it doesn’t mean the scientists were wrong, it simply shows that what they’re investigating is variable.

With Covid, scientists had to use other viruses as their dataset because there’s no past data for Covid in humans. But they can’t just tell us what they think is going to happen, they have to use data, and action can only be taken from data.

 

[PragueBlue]

I don’t know about you but I think by now everyone has either decided

I’m taking this very seriously and am concerned about our future
I’m happy to follow guidance because it’s hardly a big ask but there is a limit and we need to consider other problems
I’m young and healthy and like living my life so fuck it
I’m a conspiracy theory bellend who doesn’t actually believe it but like being a nuisance because mummy never said she loved me

I have been in the first category since it started but am pretty much in the 2nd group now. I suspect that''s the case with most people.

It would be interesting to have a poll to see where people are at with it.

 

[blueinsa]

Scientists don’t make predictions based on their own knowledge and opinion; they forecast what might happen going off past data. They can only use past data and the results can only come from that data. Their own expertise doesn’t come into it.

If the forecast doesn’t fit with the real world occurrences, it doesn’t mean the scientists were wrong, it simply shows that what they’re investigating is variable.

With Covid, scientists had to use other viruses as their dataset because there’s no past data for Covid in humans. But they can’t just tell us what they think is going to happen, they have to use data, and action can only be taken from data.

The real issue is a complicit media who can’t wait to break news that a possible 75000 deaths might occur but are not so forthcoming with news it’s hopefully a very mild illness and the possible end of covid as a dangerous virus.

 

[tonea2003]

The real issue is a complicit media who can’t wait to break news that a possible 75000 deaths might occur but are not so forthcoming with news it’s hopefully a very mild illness and the possible end of covid as a dangerous virus.

that's the bit i don't get?? suppose scaremongering makes news, whilst potentially a mild illness is meh

its as if they don't want normality to return