grunge
Well-Known Member
I think the problem is that to do valid like for like comparisons you need to have a like for like on a similar demographic ( age split. Population densities, inter generational housing etc etc )
when you compare Sweden to UK they clearly had it far better. But when you compare London to Stockholm ( similar population densities ) then Stockholm is about 6-7 time worse off ( from the last time I did the math )
when you compare Sweden to UK they clearly had it far better. But when you compare London to Stockholm ( similar population densities ) then Stockholm is about 6-7 time worse off ( from the last time I did the math )