Corruption in English football?

I may have your answer. It is widely reported that in November last year the Chinese owner of Southampton wants to sell and was using their good results to up the sale price. Since then things have gone downhill.
Last night at 1-1 it was a clear penalty and the keeper sent off. If a 9 - 1 thrashing followed some very rich important people would be very upset.

It's an interesting theory. But what is more plausible, that

1) a Chinese businessman paid money to (or perhaps threatened?) a whole lot of persons in various positions to somehow alter the outcome of a game in the PL, or

2) that the game ref made an obvious error, which everyone with eyes will agree with, but the VAR felt he lacked enough data to alter the decision? Or maybe them two hacks are friends, and the VAR didn't want to belittle his buddy?

Occam's razor, etc...


I absolutely do not rule out the possibility of the game being bent to some extent, and that there are corrupt individuals associated with the PL, all the way from staff, players, ref's, and media people.
I think it's possible that this could be taking place far more than what we are aware of, as it would only concern very very few people who likely acted on their own and not as a part of an organized group.

But if ref's were bought, if media profiles were bought, that would have to involve an extremely large group of people, and I just can't imaging it being kept under the radar for so very long.
Would becoming a corrupt ref mean they get paid off? Why else would they do it? Then how? Cash? Money isn't that easy to come by without eyebrows being raised.

And who would be at the very tip of the Corruption pyramid? Who pulls the stings? A conglomerate based on several individuals?

I don't know mate... I just feel, or maybe it's just my hope (due to the love of the sport), that such a horrible and rotten thing as an organized collective manipulating the results, - simply could not happen. It just would require to many people being involved, and sooner or later one of them, just one, would come clear and blow the whistle.
 
It's an interesting theory. But what is more plausible, that

1) a Chinese businessman paid money to (or perhaps threatened?) a whole lot of persons in various positions to somehow alter the outcome of a game in the PL, or

2) that the game ref made an obvious error, which everyone with eyes will agree with, but the VAR felt he lacked enough data to alter the decision? Or maybe them two hacks are friends, and the VAR didn't want to belittle his buddy?

Occam's razor, etc...


I absolutely do not rule out the possibility of the game being bent to some extent, and that there are corrupt individuals associated with the PL, all the way from staff, players, ref's, and media people.
I think it's possible that this could be taking place far more than what we are aware of, as it would only concern very very few people who likely acted on their own and not as a part of an organized group.

But if ref's were bought, if media profiles were bought, that would have to involve an extremely large group of people, and I just can't imaging it being kept under the radar for so very long.
Would becoming a corrupt ref mean they get paid off? Why else would they do it? Then how? Cash? Money isn't that easy to come by without eyebrows being raised.

And who would be at the very tip of the Corruption pyramid? Who pulls the stings? A conglomerate based on several individuals?

I don't know mate... I just feel, or maybe it's just my hope (due to the love of the sport), that such a horrible and rotten thing as an organized collective manipulating the results, - simply could not happen. It just would require to many people being involved, and sooner or later one of them, just one, would come clear and blow the whistle.
Mark Halsey tried and was ignored. Calciopoli showed that a small group of 'elite' referees can be bought.
 
It's an interesting theory. But what is more plausible, that

1) a Chinese businessman paid money to (or perhaps threatened?) a whole lot of persons in various positions to somehow alter the outcome of a game in the PL, or

2) that the game ref made an obvious error, which everyone with eyes will agree with, but the VAR felt he lacked enough data to alter the decision? Or maybe them two hacks are friends, and the VAR didn't want to belittle his buddy?

Occam's razor, etc...


I absolutely do not rule out the possibility of the game being bent to some extent, and that there are corrupt individuals associated with the PL, all the way from staff, players, ref's, and media people.
I think it's possible that this could be taking place far more than what we are aware of, as it would only concern very very few people who likely acted on their own and not as a part of an organized group.

But if ref's were bought, if media profiles were bought, that would have to involve an extremely large group of people, and I just can't imaging it being kept under the radar for so very long.
Would becoming a corrupt ref mean they get paid off? Why else would they do it? Then how? Cash? Money isn't that easy to come by without eyebrows being raised.

And who would be at the very tip of the Corruption pyramid? Who pulls the stings? A conglomerate based on several individuals?

I don't know mate... I just feel, or maybe it's just my hope (due to the love of the sport), that such a horrible and rotten thing as an organized collective manipulating the results, - simply could not happen. It just would require to many people being involved, and sooner or later one of them, just one, would come clear and blow the whistle.
It took me seconds to find out about the saints owner looking to sell. I merely offer it as a reason because last night was bizarre. Not one media outlet I have read said their pen was legit and they all agree ours was nailed on.
Two very important decisions at key times in a match. The first got them back in the game the second kept them in it.
Maybe the premier league want a close finish to ensure revenue
 
It took me seconds to find out about the saints owner looking to sell. I merely offer it as a reason because last night was bizarre. Not one media outlet I have read said their pen was legit and they all agree ours was nailed on.
Two very important decisions at key times in a match. The first got them back in the game the second kept them in it.
Maybe the premier league want a close finish to ensure revenue
Absolutely spot on,although don’t know about wanting a close finish to the season more about manipulating results or outcomes in games if possible,the wolves game was a similar situation Laporte goal disallowed would have been 2-0 HT and you could say possibly game done..
 
It took me seconds to find out about the saints owner looking to sell. I merely offer it as a reason because last night was bizarre. Not one media outlet I have read said their pen was legit and they all agree ours was nailed on.
Two very important decisions at key times in a match. The first got them back in the game the second kept them in it.
Maybe the premier league want a close finish to ensure revenue

Last was indeed bizarre, and I there have been other instances similarly hard to understand, not only concerning City.

It's not all all impossible, especially when such a huge amount of money is involved... but again, so many individuals would have to be involved.



Do you rule out that we as a club are a part of any such foul play? We went from getting the hardest possible cup draws to very kind ones.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.