Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 18,311
Saying it's a hoax and it has been exaggerated are nowhere near the same thing. It is clearly very real, had it been overestimated again it's pretty obvious that is also the case. It had to be though as it was totally unknown, but now we do know more about it we should be moving quicker. I can't see how furlough can end in October as it stands.
FWIW, I supported the changes in the daily reporting when they had an exaggerated affect on the figures. I go off the ONS data for the total number of deaths etc.
We are making progress but it is uncertain at the moment. Schools are back up and running next weeks (And I know they already were for the kids of frontline workers). Several boroughs in the North of England are having restrictions eased. There has been advances in the treatment of more severe cases.
The furlough issue is complex and the reduced pay subsidy from Government could reduce demand for it. Where people work for viable businesses that have furloughed staff, more imaginative solutions may be needed eg reduced wages in exchange for shares in the business and / or for agreeing to normalise working from home. Nobody wants reduced pay of course but it’s better than being out of work (in most cases). To help to compensate people’s expenditure could be cut eg by reductions in Council taxes in areas where local authority services have been reduced.