supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,923
One game a day for two weeks, and one game a day 6 out of 7 days most weeks is going to really drag this out.
It is the franchise format to increase tv revenue, for "appointment to view tv", but a lot of days it will just be switch off tv. A 23 day group stage would have gained more interest than a 39 day group stage.
Should be two games a day to condense it and keep it interesting. One game a day is only good if it's a good game. The big match ups so far have been really poor as well, the only close game was Sri Lanka v Pakistan and even then, it was pretty comfortable for Pakistan in the end. Australia have been battered twice in games you'd have hoped for a bit more drama in. England v NZ was over as soon a NZ batted.
Maybe it will get a bit of life with India v Pakistan tomorrow.
I'm finding it the same with the rugby world cup. You knew it would be France, NZ, SA, Ireland, England, Argentina, Wales in the QFs. Fiji pipping Australia is probably the only "shock" and even then, the Aussies are shite so it's not a huge surprise! Other than the match ups between those teams in the group it's been waiting for the knockouts. And then you have to wait a week between them because the soft arses can't play more than once a week!