On Aggers and Archer the fact that it's taken three and a half years for him to be proven wrong,and thus become newsworthy, suggests it wasn't such an outlandish prediction to make.
It's not the first time he has offered up an opinion on Archer that has subsequently been proven wrong but at the same time been misconstrued into something that it absolutely wasn't.
Back in 2019 he questioned Archers inclusion in the WC squad on the basis of team harmony. He was obviously referring to a side that had been hugely successful, top of the rankings and one of the favourites for that World Cup.
Didn't stop people suggesting it was about something else and making an absurd comparison with Gary Ballance coming into a Test and ODI set up that was anything but settled and successful.
Aggers was having none of it. Calling Lieuw a **** and Ronay a wanker is something we can all get behind surely.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/b...new-row-with-journalist-bbc?CMP=share_btn_url