SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
And yet you will see it as a success if we win it by a point.Rammy Blue said:SWP's back said:As I have previously stated, finishing 1st or 2nd, where you could be within a point of each other or both end on 95 pts should not matter. Someone shouldn't be sacked "just for finishing 2nd" if they get a points total that would win the league 9 times out of ten. I find that rationale to be moronic.Rammy Blue said:So you'd sack Bob if we win the Prem this season, as long as Jose was available?
The owners should have the man at the helm that they want and that they think is the long term future of the club. If that man is Mancini then it shouldn't matter whether we finish 1st or 2nd this year (and next year and the following year), if they think he is the man, then stick with him. Conversely, if we win the league this year but Mancini is seen as being 2nd choice to Jose and he's who the owners want as the considet him the best, then I believe they should make the move.
Over the course of a 38 season, the winners may finish 1 or 2 points ahead of their rivals. It would be far too fickle to sack a manager solely on the basis that he finished 2 points behind another club when you consider how easily a match can swing in the final minutes. That's why I believe it wrong to sack a manager based on winning the league or not. It has to be about more than that. The owners either have faith in the guy in charge or they don't.
You'll have splinters in your arse if you keep sitting on the fence.....
Only being facetious mate but you've done a lot of "Bob defending" in threads since the game on Sat yet choose to post today that if Jose was available you'd happily see Bob moved on regardless of whether we finish 1st or 2nd - my point really is that is exactly how a fair number of us feel.
I think a lot of it stems from the fact that if we don't win the title, imo, it will be an unmitigated disaster considering our early season form in getting to 14-1-0.
People can bang on all they like about how well the scum have done however as I've said in the other thread there are lots of faults that can be laid at Bob's door since our downturn in form - unbalanced squad with no pace or width, poor rotation of players resulting in loss of form and confidence, no plan B for teams that park the bus, shocking away form that doesn't look like changing, poor formations and systems that he changes after first half etc etc.
Anyway, I suppose what I'm saying is that even if we lose the title by 1 or 2 points I'll consider it as an abject failure - I'll hold my hands up and say I'm wrong if suddenly we click into gear and play well in the next 7 games but I've seen fuck all over the last few weeks to make me believe that will be the case.
So a 2 point swing is all it takes for you to sack or stick with a manager. I think that to be a little bit silly given how quickly one game can turn on its head (see Giggs goal at Norwich, Ji's goal against us etc).
You also forget that Utd had an amazing start to the season also and that we were level on points at the half way stage.
If they win all their remaining games before the derby, it will be something like 16 wins in 17. No one will be able to say we blew anything if they finish like thaty and on 95 points. They will have just been a better team and have a record number of points. As I say, even if we finish as Champoions, if Jose is available and the owner thinks that he is a better option then I'd get him in. No room for sentiment where domination is concerned.
As for me back/defending our manager, I don't see any problem with that, I don't think all of the ills are squarely on his shoulders. I also think some of the criticsm of him to have been unfair. It doesn't mean I don't think we can't improve though.