Dangerous Dogs

Vast majority of dogs and owners are responsible and no risk. But the Dangerous Dogs Act needs a review as not fit for purpose as far too many deaths especially children from dogs (any breed can kill) - More focus on those owners/criminals who use loopholes in law to breed dogs and do nothing to look after dog. As a dog owner myself I feel a UK registeration scheme needed and more powers to RSPCA .....but it all costs money and then issue of who enforces it all? Post covid we are seeing more dogs abandoned and mistreated as cost of living crisis hits.....the UK is seen as a dog loving country.....well not everywhere!
 

  1. PM Rishi Sunak says he will ban American XL bully dogs as they are a "danger to our communities"
  2. He says they first need to be defined as a breed but will then be banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act by the end of the year
  3. It comes after a man died after being mauled by two dogs in Staffordshire
 
aguero93:20 said:
Nah. Just ban all working breeds, saves time when the scrotes inevitably move onto herding breeds like GSDs, Malinois, Komondors, Kangals and other working breeds like Huskies, Chows, Newfoundlands, Dobermans and Labradors.

Especially Labs, once they move onto those every single attack will be fatal. People don't realise the destructive potential of that breed, pound for pound the strongest breed I've seen (and they're not exactly small), bite harder than pitbulls, incredible energy levels and can be trained for anything. Average adult won't stand a chance.
Click to expand...

What a load of old toot.

Working breeds are bred for specific things. It is part of their design. For instance, a labrador is bred to retrieve things from water. Originally fishing nets. They would leap from a fishermen's boat to swim out and bring the nets back to the boat. So they could gather the fish caught in the net.

In Europe, this eventually evolved into retrieving game birds from the water, for people shooting birds, so they became gun dogs. But the skillset is exactly the same.

It is highly unlikely that a bunch of scrotes, from a council estate in Stoke, would be able to bypass hundreds of years of evolution, in order to re-train a placid and non aggressive breed, such as a labrador, to bring down a Bull.

Also, the size and strength of a Labradors jaw, is nothing in comparison to a pit bull type dog.

This is a far fetched scenario. The dogs that kill people are known, and are like ticking timebombs, because it is in their DNA to be aggressive and to fight to the death, using their incredible body strength and devastating jaw power.
 
Last edited:
mexico1970 said:

  1. PM Rishi Sunak says he will ban American XL bully dogs as they are a "danger to our communities"
  2. He says they first need to be defined as a breed but will then be banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act by the end of the year
  3. It comes after a man died after being mauled by two dogs in Staffordshire
Click to expand...
Be interesting to see how they define the breed, but I’d say the response from the DCC is the more sensible one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.