nmc
Well-Known Member
I wonder if they'd swap for a familiar Bosnian striker?
Jack Wills said:Wasn't good enough for Chelsea, so why would be be good enough for us?
Jack Wills said:Wasn't good enough for Chelsea, so why would be be good enough for us?
raymondkl92 said:Definitely a better option that Navas. They should take Navas and 10 million.
raymondkl92 said:Definitely a better option that Navas. They should take Navas and 10 million.
Not to mention why would the rich Wolfsburg want to take that deal? Get rid of their best player, who is just 23 years old for an inferior 29 year old (notoriously finds it hard to settle, does not know the language) and plays in a different position? De Bruyne has been good this season, but is not world class and he is best down the middle, though can play out wide. Good player for a team like Liverpool/Tottenham/even Arsenal, but not good enough for City for anything more than a squad player.Matt the Giant said:raymondkl92 said:Definitely a better option that Navas. They should take Navas and 10 million.
You don't think Navas has a say on that?