Your gist being that those countries legalising euthanasia/assisted dying have facilities to accomplish those ends which only use lethal injections as opposed to the other commonplace execution method? I would think the latter would probably be only slightly less humane for those on a low budget certainly more so than the electric chair or being taken into a field and shot.
do you have issues understanding basic facts? or just enjoy obfuscating your lack of facts?
I'll make it simple, you said:
'Legalize euthanasia and watch the global hedge funds switch from creating vape shops, tooth whitening salons & no fuss cremations to drop in gas chambers.'
I provided info that "legalized euthanasia" already exists in 9 countries (with many others to lesser degrees), and that gas chambers don't appear to exist in those countries, in relation to it.
I then went on, and gave info about a related topic called "assisted suicide" which is similar albeit different, with similar lists of countries and the lack, still, of the gas chambers you stridently claimed would exist if "legalized euthanasia" existed.
You've now
1. pointed out a spelling error in my reply
2. deliberately dodged the demolishing of the fact that you were spouting rubbish about 'gas chambers'
3. revisited my facts and tried to bring in a state execution method (noticeably absent from most of countries I mentioned), in some whataboutry way.
At the moment, you're looking at needing a bigger shovel, and a lot of shoring props for the hole you are digging yourself.
Edit: To get back on topic.
Maybe the thread title should be 'Dear atheists... Thanks for being factual, in the face of sheer fanciful dogma"