George Hannah
Well-Known Member
Do we think Pellegrini is content with his own decisions which have led to four away defeats, humiliation at home by Munich, an undeserved draw at Stoke and a lucky win against Hull? Does he even care?
herewegoagain said:Tell me anything I said that is wrong.
herewegoagain said:Agree, we have another clown in charge with a fancy foreign name.
Rodwell is still carrying an injury and is not 100% yet.herewegoagain said:Why did he play Garcia? He is useless, why not Rodwell?
Negredo for Dzeko may have been to give Sunderland something different to consider as although tall, they have different styles of play. General consensus on Richards was that he had a poor game, so surely it was right for him to come off?herewegoagain said:Sunderland had one forward yet he changed like for like taking off Negredo for Dzecko and Richards for Zaba? Should have taken a defender off and kept Negredo on.
That's generally what Navas does when he plays.herewegoagain said:Navas was great first 5 mins, then started going inside? Where is the coaching for the bleeding obvious?
We could have parked the bus, put 10 across the 6 yard box and I'm not sure that night it would have made a blind bit of difference as Bayern were exceptional.herewegoagain said:Peligrini also totally ballsed up against Bayern. They had 5 in midfield, and probably the best midfield in Europe, so he plays 4 in midfield and had Dzecko upfront who can't trap a bag of cement so nothing sticks.We got battered but wouldn't have if he would have used basic football common sense!
Some times you need some luck. However, spanking the shite at the swamp 6-1, Spurs 5-1 at White Hart Lane, etc were far from lucky occurrences.herewegoagain said:Mancini wasn't any better, he made some ridiculous decisions and we got very lucky winning the league and the cup if we are honest.
Someone like Sam Allardyce? Steve Bruce? Ian Holloway? David Moyes? Chris Hughton? Alan Pardew? Martin Jol? Martin O'Neill?herewegoagain said:We need to find a manager who has common sense and knows the Premier League inside out. It's not rocket science.
Ruben Cousillas. Unfortunately, I don't know too much about him, least of all how much he earns.herewegoagain said:Finally who is that miserable looking git who sits next to Pelligrini? How the hell would he inspire anybody. Is is jobs for his mates yet again? How much do these clowns earn? Money for old rope.
gio's side step said:strongbowholic said:We've had stunning victories vs the shite, Newcastle and Norwich plus made progress in Europe (lesson from Bayern aside) so you can see Pellegrini definitely has something about him. I agree he should be getting more from the squad - particularly away from home in the league. As has been said to death already, he needs to pick a settled back four and ease up on the rotation. Yes there are times key players need a rest, but the continual wholesale chopping and changing needs a review - it's that kind of large scale tinkering that did not help Ranieri's or Benitez's teams at times; the more settled they were seemed to be when they were at their most successful.
When I see Pellegrini, I cannot find anything from him that I can nail my colours to in the same way I could Mancini. I don't see him in training so don't know if he is like that with the players and more importantly, I'm not a player so don't even know if that is important to a player. The point I am making here is that if the only thing I have to worry about is a cult of personality from our manager, I would suggest things aren't anything like as apocalyptic as suggested in some posts.
Stunning victories against Newcastle and Norwich are not a true indication of where we are this stage of the season. Away results are unfortunately.
And getting out of a group which includes Plznen and Moscow is not significant progress and most City fans I speak to believe we would have qualified with Mancini as manager from that group.
Absolutely! Thats the thing to be afraid of. We bought ourselves some time by winning the league (which was quite jammy to be fair). Fact is, that defence HAS to be sorted out pronto.robbieh said:BillyShears said:strongbowholic said:The point I am making here is that if the only thing I have to worry about is a cult of personality from our manager, I would suggest things aren't anything like as apocalyptic as suggested in some posts.
But it isn't the only thing is it. The next seven games will tell us a lot.
Spurs, Swansea, Arsenal and Liverpool at home.
WBA, Southampton and Fulham away.
Some tough looking fixtures. At the moment it is difficult to say what is going to happen. 14 points and we will probably treading water. 18 we will be back in it. Anything less and the Barca boys will be getting ready to pull the plug. Not being top four is not an option.
George Hannah said:Do we think Pellegrini is content with his own decisions which have led to four away defeats, humiliation at home by Munich, an undeserved draw at Stoke and a lucky win against Hull? Does he even care?
George Hannah said:Does he even care?
Marvin said:10 points from the next 12 would be good enough and would put us back in the top 4 and very likely in touch with Arsenal.adrianr said:Marvin said:What do you want Pellegrini to say after a defeat? I've seen criticism on here because of his demeanour on the bench when he's watching the game. This is pretty low stuff, and not what I would expect from City fans
You listen to Wenger, Moyes or any top manager after a defeat. Do they make much sense? Mourinho has plenty of excuses and rants but they are even worse than silence.
The only place to sort it out is on the pitch and and training ground, and the only place for words and explanation is the dressing room when the manager has had time to reflect and digest events. Fans want rational explanations for defeat, but maybe these things are just not possible in the immediate aftermath of a defeat.
I want to give Pellegrini a chance but I can not understand how we can have dominated every game (with exception of Stoke) in terms of possession and shots and come away with so few points. The results reflect some bad luck, or defending and poor attacking play. They are also in pat anomalous.
If we were to pay WBA tomorrow away (our next away game), would you expect to win, lose or draw?
Low perhaps, but unsurprising. Fans are passionate people. To see a manager lose so many games without such as a blink of emotion across his face is infuriating. Christ even Wenger takes it out on water bottles occasionally. Looking not only like you don't give a shit, but that you simply don't understand why we're loosing is infuriating.
This was a frequent occurrence under Mancini, but as many of us were repeatedly reminded last season, possession doesn't win prizes, points do. I expected a period of transition from slow methodical defensive side to a quicker more aggressive pressing side. However the main thing about any top team in transition, is they must always continue to be a top team (As AVB found out at Chelsea). You have to stay in and around the top 3/4, perhaps not convert everything to wins, but at the very least don't convert draws (or in our case wins) into losses. Maybe we're doing too much too fast, regardless, it falls on the manager to pace the change. He's, IMO, got that pace drastically wrong. As evidenced by our repeated defensive failings. Does anyone think Sunderland, or Villa, or Cardiffs back lines are better than ours? If loosing Vinny is such a problem, sit the team deeper, throw on another midfielder, just do *something* to ensure we stop conceding goals. Stop charging off chanting 'We'll score more than you', whilst we get sucker punched by long ball over the top after long ball over the top.
Against WBA, I'd expect us to win, because we are, or at least should be the better team. We beat them last season with ten men for a huge portion of the match, even came from behind. However I expected us to beat everyone we've lost to this season with the exception of Chelsea. Will we? Well, christ only knows. Realistically we need 6 points from WBA and Southampton, 4 wouldn't be good enough. Getting 3 points at Southampton will be very difficult. Do it and it may just have the team thinking we can get 3 points at our other tough away grounds.
August, Sep and October has gone. Commit it to memory. learn from it. Use it to avoid complacency, and lets get to the New Year within 3 points of the top. If we do that, then every City fan will be rightly confident of winning back the title from Man Utd
It's annoying to have thrown points away, but lets use the experience positively. I refuse to accept that City can't make 3 points on Arsenal and Man Utd between now and New Year, and another 3 points on them between then and May. It's a very limited and achievable target
I bet that feels good to post Billy.BillyShears said:George Hannah said:Does he even care?
He certainly cares more than one or two on this thread who seem more interested in City losing so they can say "I told you so" about the manager.
Perhaps their initial enthusiasm has just proved misplaced, Pellegrini just smiles his way through post match defeat interviews telling us all how mystifying it is that his superior side failed to win. He knows he's safe in his job no matter what.BillyShears said:George Hannah said:Does he even care?
He certainly cares more than one or two on this thread who seem more interested in City losing so they can say "I told you so" about the manager.