You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Discuss Pellegrini (Pt 3)
- Thread starter NQCitizen
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:100 million pounds spent virtually says we should be winning the league at a canter.
Obviously it doesn't given the Rags ran away with it last season.
Skashion
Well-Known Member
The rags outspent us last season, as did Chelsea. This season we're the top spenders.FantasyIreland said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:100 million pounds spent virtually says we should be winning the league at a canter.
Obviously it doesn't given the Rags ran away with it last season.
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,497
Maybe so but we should be winning a lot more away games than we are..how long do we give the away form...sunderland..west brom..southampton??FantasyIreland said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:100 million pounds spent virtually says we should be winning the league at a canter.
Obviously it doesn't given the Rags ran away with it last season.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Skashion said:The rags outspent us last season, as did Chelsea. This season we're the top spenders.FantasyIreland said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:100 million pounds spent virtually says we should be winning the league at a canter.
Obviously it doesn't given the Rags ran away with it last season.
The players we bought have simply replaced those that have left,we haven't improved our depth.
Lancet Fluke
Well-Known Member
Skashion said:The rags outspent us last season, as did Chelsea. This season we're the top spenders.FantasyIreland said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:100 million pounds spent virtually says we should be winning the league at a canter.
Obviously it doesn't given the Rags ran away with it last season.
If you take out zaha who didn't join up with them until after the season ended then net spend was pretty much the same as ours, I think.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Ric said:FFS lads, let it go. The rest of us are bored shitless with it.
I'm going to do something far more useful and clean the apartment. Tomorrow I'm off away for the weekend so you'll be delighted to know that I won't be able to log back in until Monday.
Enjoy a quiet weekend ... ;)
Skashion
Well-Known Member
As in left before or during last season? Perhaps, although I feel this is the best squad we've had. However, have we improved the squad with respect to last season. Fuck yes we have.FantasyIreland said:The players we bought have simply replaced those that have left,we haven't improved our depth.
BillyShears said:waspish said:When you have a team set up to attack your more likely to make mistakes at the back because the defence is getting no cover, it is all well and good going for a winner away from home at your rivals in the 89th minute but it leaves you wide open
You'd have a point if Ian Holloway was the City manager ... but since he isn't I've got no idea what you're on about.
So 1-1 couple of minutes to go and you still have 95% of are squad in Chelsea half? All well and good if we were at home for me we needed to shut up shop in the last 5 mins because that's what Mourinho was doing and if you defend well you get lucky with hoof now and again especially with how we have defended recently...
Skashion
Well-Known Member
Wrong. Their net spending for the season was double ours. We had a net spend of £14m last season. The rags, was £31m I think (not including Zaha).Lancet Fluke said:If you take out zaha who didn't join up with them until after the season ended then net spend was pretty much the same as ours, I think.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.