Discuss Pellegrini (Pt 4)

[I'm no cynic but...]

Big performance required tomorrow for sure to keep the hacks from sharpening the knives even more. You can just sense one bad result and they will be like a dog with a bone.

Says the biggest hack of them all!

So what? He's right in what he says. You know it will happen if the result goes against us.

 

[argyle]

Don't even bother listening to his Friday interviews now.I find him dour and completely uninspiring.

Sorry just can't take to the bloke personally however hope the results away from home start to improve and we get moving up the table. Big performance required tomorrow for sure to keep the hacks from sharpening the knives even more. You can just sense one bad result and they will be like a dog with a bone.

You mean yourself from sharpening the knife.

You've been crying about Mancini leaving since the summer, time to let him go...

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

Personally I couldn't give a shite whether Pellegrini's press conferences are insufferably bland or akin to a Jim Jeffries rant, and I'm amazed to see City fans using the lack of excitement at these banal gatherings, with their endless brain dead questions from hacks operating to a pre-determined agenda, as a stick with which to beat our manager. I rather suspect that certain posters, still bitter about Mancini having been sacked, are just disposed to picking fault with his successor, no matter what he does.
Whatever, I'd far rather endure Peller's studied indifference, than listen to Mourinho talk shite and get rewarded with sycophantic tittering.

 

[mancity1]

He's been saying since he took over we have the best squad in the league.

While that's all a bit subjective , its time he and the players started to prove to themselves and us that the tag is appropriate.

 

[blueinsa]

Personally I couldn't give a shite whether Pellegrini's press conferences are insufferably bland or akin to a Jim Jeffries rant, and I'm amazed to see City fans using the lack of excitement at these banal gatherings, with their endless brain dead questions from hacks operating to a pre-determined agenda, as a stick with which to beat our manager. I rather suspect that certain posters, still bitter about Mancini having been sacked, are just disposed to picking fault with his successor, no matter what he does.
Whatever, I'd far rather endure Peller's studied indifference, than listen to Mourinho talk shite and get rewarded with sycophantic tittering.

Bang on the money as usual mate.

 

[Anonymous]

Personally I couldn't give a shite whether Pellegrini's press conferences are insufferably bland or akin to a Jim Jeffries rant, and I'm amazed to see City fans using the lack of excitement at these banal gatherings, with their endless brain dead questions from hacks operating to a pre-determined agenda, as a stick with which to beat our manager. I rather suspect that certain posters, still bitter about Mancini having been sacked, are just disposed to picking fault with his successor, no matter what he does.
Whatever, I'd far rather endure Peller's studied indifference, than listen to Mourinho talk shite and get rewarded with sycophantic tittering.

Bang on the money as usual mate.

I don't understand why anyone would complain about having a manager who gives the London press pack absolutely nothing. Certainly that's got to be better than perpetually negative headlines provided by the manager on show.

 

[simon23]

Couldnt give a shit if his press cinferences are boring or not, though for me i wush he would bea little more less open tin givung the injury situations away as surely that lets the opposition know what our team is going to be. However ither managers do that as well.

One thing is,for certaun is that our performances and results do need to improve or the knuved will be out and deserveely so the pressure will be on big time if other results go against us

 

[blueinsa]

Couldnt give a shit if his press cinferences are boring or not, though for me i wush he would bea little more less open tin givung the injury situations away as surely that lets the opposition know what our team is going to be. However ither managers do that as well.

One thing is,for certaun is that our performances and results do need to improve or the knuved will be out and deserveely so the pressure will be on big time if other results go against us

Fuck me that was hard work mate. You on the phone?

 

[mancity1]

Personally I couldn't give a shite whether Pellegrini's press conferences are insufferably bland or akin to a Jim Jeffries rant, and I'm amazed to see City fans using the lack of excitement at these banal gatherings, with their endless brain dead questions from hacks operating to a pre-determined agenda, as a stick with which to beat our manager. I rather suspect that certain posters, still bitter about Mancini having been sacked, are just disposed to picking fault with his successor, no matter what he does.
Whatever, I'd far rather endure Peller's studied indifference, than listen to Mourinho talk shite and get rewarded with sycophantic tittering.

Bang on the money as usual mate.

I don't understand why anyone would complain about having a manager who gives the London press pack absolutely nothing. Certainly that's got to be better than perpetually negative headlines provided by the manager on show.

The press will seek the headline no matter what.

Hart not ready says MP , MP doubts Hart's credentials.

Who cares.

All that we should be interested in is who is available and who is not , anything else from these conferencces is not worth discussing,

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Couldnt give a shit if his press cinferences are boring or not, though for me i wush he would bea little more less open tin givung the injury situations away as surely that lets the opposition know what our team is going to be. However ither managers do that as well.

One thing is,for certaun is that our performances and results do need to improve or the knuved will be out and deserveely so the pressure will be on big time if other results go against us

Are you sponsored by the letter 'u'?