mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
Ducado said:mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
A classic case of you projecting your opinion on the whole world
Did you see us today Billy, we were shit, I think mutts seen a lot more football than you and is probably more intelligentBillyShears said:mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
Hahahahaha. That's a terrible post but equally hysterically funny.
Whats so funny, you kick out the best manager we have had since Mercer then employ a man who is a mediocre second rate La Ligue coach and we are fucked, because today HULL yes fucking HULL could have been 3 up in 20 minsBillyShears said:mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
Hahahahaha. That's a terrible post but equally hysterically funny.
mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
BillyShears said:mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
Hahahahaha. That's a terrible post but equally hysterically funny.
BringBackSwales said:BobKowalski said:hgblue said:He's supposed to be a top quality manager, up there with the likes of Mourinho. Early days I know, but I highly doubt it. For the first time since his appointment, I'm really worried that we've dropped a bollock.
Yes. Pellegrini's CV certainly puts him in the top bracket with Mourinho...
Pellegrini is many things. A fine human being. A good coach and probably a good laugh over a beer or two but if you or anyone else actually believed any of that guff about Pellegrini being in the same bracket as Mourinho then I am genuinely astounded.
I think his difference from Mourinho, and indeed Mancini, is the key to him being picked - he will accept the director of football's signings, he will accept the holistic philosophy, and by and large he will do what the senior executives ask him to - something that Bobby was not prepared to, and Mourinho would not have been prepared to. I am not by the way having a pop at Pellegrini, I am just stating what I believe to be the case
Don't get me wrong, I thought this place was for projecting options?Ducado said:mammutly said:blue underpants said:We should have stuck with Mancini
There is no real argument to the contrary. Virtually everyone in football would agree with you.
Sadly, the Sheikh was persuaded by the suits that they could do it better. Maybe in the future we will do a Chelski and bring him back.
A classic case of you projecting your opinion on the whole world