As far as I can see the Rafa link is an obvious wind up.
Why do you take this seriously?
If City change manager then we have the perfect caretaker manager in place in Vieira. We change now, and then give it until the rest of he season, and then review again. We don't need to make 1 year appointments, we make a change on a caretaker basis. The need is now, to get 3rd.
However this is all pointless - it's pretty clear that we're going with Pellegrini for the moment at least. I find it hard to believe that a team who sacked Mancini for finishing 2nd, are now somehow prepared to give Pellegrini more time when for he last 3 months we've been playing like a bottom 6 side.
There doesn't seem any logic in it other than self-preservation i.e. if their appointment goes down, then Txiki and Soriano go too.
Why do you take this seriously?
If City change manager then we have the perfect caretaker manager in place in Vieira. We change now, and then give it until the rest of he season, and then review again. We don't need to make 1 year appointments, we make a change on a caretaker basis. The need is now, to get 3rd.
However this is all pointless - it's pretty clear that we're going with Pellegrini for the moment at least. I find it hard to believe that a team who sacked Mancini for finishing 2nd, are now somehow prepared to give Pellegrini more time when for he last 3 months we've been playing like a bottom 6 side.
There doesn't seem any logic in it other than self-preservation i.e. if their appointment goes down, then Txiki and Soriano go too.