Discussion: Potential Pellegrini Replacements {merged}

  • Thread starter Deleted member 58678
  • Start date
mansour's tow ropes said:
bluefandk said:
I would love Klopp at City, I just dont see it happening while Txiki is still DOF he clearly doesnt want a strong manager.
Click to expand...

Theres been a lot of murmurings from the press that Abu Dhabi is willing overrule the Spanish impostors (who aren't keen on Ancellotti apparently). What that says about their position (if true) is another question, but I couldn't care less what they want right now.
Click to expand...

LOL.

You people are absolutely hilarious with how far away on these things you are. It's like you invent whatever story most fits what you want to happen and then say "I've heard this in the press".

If you would know a single thing about how they do business, there is absolutely no way that they don't go with Soriano/Begiristain decisions. None even at all.
 
IWasHere said:
supercity88 said:
Summerbuzz said:
Yeah, I think the pressure on Txiki is immense. Looking at the UK press, his transfer record is being pulled to shreds by all an sundry, loads of stories have said this is far worse than Mancini's last season, loads more saying our squad suddenly looks very old (his responsibility again), and every single broadsheet has printed an op-ed piece this week saying that waiting for Pep is an absurd strategy.
Click to expand...

They would be right to do so as well. I've always thought it a foolish thing to do, to wait for a certain manager. Football doesn't wait around for people. Txiki could go, Pep could change his mind and perhaps we aren't in a position to attract him anymore. I don't like Pep, I don't want him here, he wouldn't want to come anyway so personally I think it's always been a pipe dream. Klopp and City go together perfectly.
Click to expand...

Exactly, this ain't a game. You don't just wait for a manager to become available and then hire him. All top clubs will be after him and who knows, he may even extend his contract at Bayern.
Click to expand...

Erm? It's football! Which, last time I looked, was a game!

Sorry to be pedantic! ;-)
 
Ray78 said:
If it is Klopp then we would have to give him more than 12 months before turning on him.
Click to expand...

As long as we don't give him the same group of players and expect a hugely different result.
 
chabal said:
Ray78 said:
If it is Klopp then we would have to give him more than 12 months before turning on him.
Click to expand...

Only if he wins 2 trophies in those 12 months.

Otherwise he's fair game.
Click to expand...

He is more of a builder than instant success. This going to take time and this is more of a Guardiola alternative more than on a interim basis.
 
I'll Be honest, I would take back Mancini in a heartbeat.

All the "bust ups" and "arguements" the press reported on were with Balotelli and Nasri.

Balotelli didnt help himself with his off field antics, although he always referred to Mancini as a father figure, and Nasri's attitude can be horrendous.

Balotelli is no longer at the club and Nasri seems to be on the way out.

Mancini would give us back the hunger and desire he instilled in the team, defensive solidity, work rate he demanded, and more than that the mental toughness to cope with pressure.

I dont know about you lot, but i havn't heard of Mancini having any problems in Italy with players, thery all want to play for him.

Having moved to the CFA as well means far less Camera's popping up over a fence and trying to catch a photo of something out of context too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.