W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
So I didn’t read them the next day? You are one of a kind!!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter RichardDunneOwnGoal
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
So I didn’t read them the next day? You are one of a kind!!
My tone is calm, you're just easily offended. And throwing those articles in for an alternative perspective, when you haven't actually read them, is useless and only testifies to your gullibility or intellectual laziness.Where did I suggest you should read the articles before you comment! I just threw them in for an alternative perspective to widen the narrative. I said I would read them tommorow and I did. As I said several articles stated he had a point.
Calm your tone!!
Read all 3 articles and then comment.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
My tone is calm, you're just easily offended. And throwing those articles in for an alternative perspective, when you haven't actually read them, is useless and only testifies to your gullibility or intellectual laziness.
I am not being insulted by you any longer.did you rea the alternative perspective by the way? Did they have any merit? Any comments?
malg
Well-Known Member
I can't believe you lot get all excited about it. You must be bored.Him calling a war widow, her mother and a Congresswoman a liar.
Issue with that?
You must be bored to comment on the fact that others are commenting on it.I can't believe you lot get all excited about it. You must be bored.
I am not being insulted by you any longer.
More proof that you're just easily offended.
What I find offensive is dismissing opinions using articles that you didn't even bother to read.
I did read it, unlike you, and I already replied with my objections to the article.I am not being insulted by you any longer.did you rea the alternative perspective by the way? Did they have any merit? Any comments?
And no, they had little merit as they made false claims.
Were you too busy to read any comments on the articles you suggested or do you just prefer to ignore legitimate criticism ?
Here is what I said as you'll probably be too busy to look it up anyway.
Hmm an opinion piece by a member of a conservative think thank that operates out of Washington. No real wonder where his allegiances will gravitate towards.
Basically he's accusing Iran of now possibly developing nuclear weapons on military sites which the IAEA supposedly has no acces to.
Yet the IAEA maintains it has had access to all locations it needed to visit and IAEA Director-General Yukia Amano defends the verification regime as the "most robust" being conducted anywhere today and insists that military sites are not off-limits.
I'll take the word of the IAEA director over any political actor.
Last edited:
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
I did read it, unlike you, and I already replied with my objections to the article.
And no, they had little merit as they made false claims.
Were you too busy to read any comments on the articles you suggested or do you just prefer to ignore legitimate criticism ?
Here is what I said as you'll probably be too busy to look it up anyway.
You quoted one - I posted several.
You posted three links, one's a video, the other one's a letter to the Times, so they're not even proper articles, which you'd know had you bothered to actually open those links.You quoted one - I posted several.
I replied to the article which was actually worth replying to.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
You posted three links, one's a video, the other one's a letter to the Times, so they're not even proper articles, which you'd know had you bothered to actually open those links.
I replied to the article which was actually worth replying to.
I posted 4 in total. I saw about 12 giving some merit to his viewpoint. You have made your mind up.
I will judge him when he has been given a chance. The witchunt is disgusting.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.