Standing up for a nonce. I can only assume one thing.Yeah right
Standing up for a nonce. I can only assume one thing.Yeah right
Frothy will be on his 6th pint of Holts best bitter by now. He will get back to you after he’s had a nap.Standing up for a nonce. I can only assume one thing.
Problem with that is in places that have very strong guns law happen to have rampant gun crime. Go figure.
As a side bar some mope tried to carjack judge sotomayors security details vehicle. He got shot for his trouble. Ironically, the judge is a strong advocate of gun control ie anti gun in citizens hands. Yet another case of rules for me but not for thee.
Any politician/celebrity who advocates banning guns should not be able to have any and that goes for their security detail as well.
I am talking about in the USA. It’s very true. Cities such as New York, Chicago, Washington DC have extremely tough gun laws which they rarely enforce. In those cities it’s very difficult nigh impossible to get a permit unless you are politically connected or have power, hence, my Sotomayor example of rules for these but not for me …Your first sentence is nonsense. Britain for example has draconian gun laws and hardly any gun crime; it is largely limited to drug gang rivalry.
That’s not what you said. You linked tough gun laws with high crime as though one followed the other. You are drawing a general rule from a particular set. Not logical. Then you say the places in your example don’t actually enforce their laws which makes your case a nonsense. Do places that have draconian sexual assault laws have huge numbers of sexual assaults? It’s actually the other way round.I am talking about in the USA. It’s very true. Cities such as New York, Chicago, Washington DC have extremely tough gun laws which they rarely enforce. In those cities it’s very difficult nigh impossible to get a permit unless you are politically connected or have power, hence, my Sotomayor example of rules for these but not for me …
Yeah Wyoming and Montana are more dangerous and crime ridden than the New York metropolitan area and Chicago. Yeah right. Come on, man…This is demonstrably untrue. Here are several highly reputable reviews of per capita gun violence by state. Per capita rates should be used as it helps to normalise data, given the most crime of any kind is going to occur where there are the most people, so you can’t base comparisons on nominal rates of crime; i.e. New York is going to have many times the total instances of gun violence than Wyoming because New York City alone has 13x the number of people than the entire state of Wyoming.
The states with very strong gun laws generally have to lowest per capita rates of gun violence. The states with very weak gun laws generally have the highest per capita rates of gun violence. There are a few exceptions, but nonpartisan researchers have attributed relatively higher rates of gun violence in those few states with strict gun laws to gun trafficking (illegal activity, which ironically often starts with legal gun purchases in states with week gun laws) and organised crime (which is aided by state-by-state gun laws, rather than federal-level laws, allowing bad actors to source guns from states where they are easy to acquire and hold, often en masse).
![]()
What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S.
More Americans died of gun-related injuries in 2021 than in any other year on record, according to the latest available statistics from the CDC.www.pewresearch.org
Stats of the States - Firearm Mortality
www.cdc.gov
![]()
U.S. gun violence rate by state 2024 | Statista
Gun violence in 2024 was highest in Mississippi, followed by Louisiana, New Mexico, Alabama, and Montana.www.statista.com
Additionally, states (and countries) that have the highest rates of gun ownership also generally—and unsurprisingly—have the highest rates of gun violence. Here is a rundown of the phenomenon from an Ammo supplier (which is fairly accurate, unfortunately)!
Gun Ownership by State (2024 Statistics)
Which states have the highest rates of guns per capita? This article breaks down gun ownership by state.ammo.com
That incident actually highlights the need for stronger nationwide gun laws, as the person who shot the carjacker (who was an untrained civilian) was part of Sotomayer’s security detail (trained member of security/law enforcement). Even the federal gun laws that the most progressive Democracts want to pass would not restrict gun possession by trained members of law enforcement, government security, or military personal engaged in official duties (unless they have been disqualified due to illegal activity in the course of their duties or private life, like in cases of convictions for domestic violence or instances of gun crime).
It is not a case of “rules for me but not for thee”—Sotomayor and other progressive Democrats support strong gun laws for civilians that have no need to own or use a gun as they are not a member of a “well-(state)regulated militia”.
Perhaps if the US had implemented stronger federal gun laws two decades ago, the attempted assassination of Trump would not have occurred.
Will be interesting to see where he goes from here. His stock speech is mostly lies about his term in office and lies about people he doesn't like. He rambles between these topics with little original material.Changing his speech to the RNC on Thursday to concentrate on "unity" over Biden bashing.
Maybe he has been humbled? I'll reserve judgement until I hear it.
What a thoughtful, well-researched response to Seb. You’ve won me over with your statistics and insight.Yeah Wyoming and Montana are more dangerous and crime ridden than the New York metropolitan area and Chicago. Yeah right. Come on, man…
Some of your stats are extremely deceiving. For example the rate on New York is very low as it takes into account ALL of New York State. I grew up 100 miles north of my city and it’s easy to get a permit especially for your home. Not so when I lived in my city. You are telling me the crime rate, violent crime rate, is worse where I grew up than in my city. No way.This is demonstrably untrue. Here are several highly reputable reviews of per capita gun violence by state. Per capita rates should be used as it helps to normalise data, given the most crime of any kind is going to occur where there are the most people, so you can’t base comparisons on nominal rates of crime; i.e. New York is going to have many times the total instances of gun violence than Wyoming because New York City alone has 13x the number of people than the entire state of Wyoming.
The states with very strong gun laws generally have to lowest per capita rates of gun violence. The states with very weak gun laws generally have the highest per capita rates of gun violence. There are a few exceptions, but nonpartisan researchers have attributed relatively higher rates of gun violence in those few states with strict gun laws to gun trafficking (illegal activity, which ironically often starts with legal gun purchases in states with week gun laws) and organised crime (which is aided by state-by-state gun laws, rather than federal-level laws, allowing bad actors to source guns from states where they are easy to acquire and hold, often en masse).
![]()
What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S.
More Americans died of gun-related injuries in 2021 than in any other year on record, according to the latest available statistics from the CDC.www.pewresearch.org
Stats of the States - Firearm Mortality
www.cdc.gov
![]()
U.S. gun violence rate by state 2024 | Statista
Gun violence in 2024 was highest in Mississippi, followed by Louisiana, New Mexico, Alabama, and Montana.www.statista.com
Additionally, states (and countries) that have the highest rates of gun ownership also generally—and unsurprisingly—have the highest rates of gun violence. Here is a rundown of the phenomenon from an Ammo supplier (which is fairly accurate, unfortunately)!
Gun Ownership by State (2024 Statistics)
Which states have the highest rates of guns per capita? This article breaks down gun ownership by state.ammo.com
That incident actually highlights the need for stronger nationwide gun laws, as the person who shot the carjacker (who was an untrained civilian) was part of Sotomayer’s security detail (trained member of security/law enforcement). Even the federal gun laws that the most progressive Democracts want to pass would not restrict gun possession by trained members of law enforcement, government security, or military personal engaged in official duties (unless they have been disqualified due to illegal activity in the course of their duties or private life, like in cases of convictions for domestic violence or instances of gun crime).
It is not a case of “rules for me but not for thee”—Sotomayor and other progressive Democrats support strong gun laws for civilians that have no need to own or use a gun as they are not a member of a “well-(state)regulated militia”.
Perhaps if the US had implemented stronger federal gun laws two decades ago, the attempted assassination of Trump would not have occurred.
You aren’t arguing with facts, you are arguing with feelings. I have presented facts that refute your claim, which is a common one based on not understanding how crime or statistics works (or how civilisation works, for that matter).Yeah Wyoming and Montana are more dangerous and crime ridden than the New York metropolitan area and Chicago. Yeah right. Come on, man…