alky313 said:salfordblues said:With reports (this morning) that Rags are favourites for his signature, Would you now settle for him guaranteeing a move to Chelsea.
This would mean that there's no chance we'd get him, but the Rags wouldn't get him either.
Would you take this scenario now or take a gamble in the hope that we can still get him?
I'm not afraid of United getting anyone.
Marvin said:They spent £55m last Summer, and can't afford not to spendCrescent said:balotelli17 said:i think we'll sign him tbh imo chelsea wont need him as they have marin, de bruynne, davila and also piazon will most likely start out wide as will feruz so i dont think chelseas an option but you never know with roman, i dont think united will go after him after they signed nick powell and i also think hes not fergies type of player, i think we'll get him and he'll fit in well maybe its just his agent messing about bico is well known for this. we have to remember when bobby went to watch hazard he was with bico.
^This.
The rags can't pay 35mil and his weekly wages.
Whereas Chelsea have a slight chance but I still doubt he will go there even if they're CL champions since they have signed Marko Marin and he plays the exact role as Eden ( uses both feet, winger, attacking midfielder, slower than Eden ) so he won't have a lot play time with them.
I believe he's going to sign with us once the transfer windows open.
With SSN saying they understand MUFC is his preferred option we must assume they're favourites. They're not always right, but they wouldn't say that unless they had good reason
pudge said:What? Your initial post didn't make sense (or was a pathetic joke I'm not sure yet),MSP said:pudge said:21 + 15 = 40?
You missed the plus. Plus I'm not impressed with your perfectionism :)
Cheers
Plus, who's to say Hazard won't be playing at a high level at the age of 36 say? Look at Giggs and Scholes
*Insert not sure if serious picture*MSP said:pudge said:What? Your initial post didn't make sense (or was a pathetic joke I'm not sure yet),MSP said:You missed the plus. Plus I'm not impressed with your perfectionism :)
Cheers
Plus, who's to say Hazard won't be playing at a high level at the age of 36 say? Look at Giggs and Scholes
well, if you think that Giggs and Scholes are playing at top level, specially first one, than it's cool..
salfordblues said:alky313 said:salfordblues said:With reports (this morning) that Rags are favourites for his signature, Would you now settle for him guaranteeing a move to Chelsea.
This would mean that there's no chance we'd get him, but the Rags wouldn't get him either.
Would you take this scenario now or take a gamble in the hope that we can still get him?
I'm not afraid of United getting anyone.
Sky sources said they're favourites to sign. Although, it isn't the OS, you've got to give it some credence.
samharris said:bluedacris said:I can see why he would sign for either chelsea or the rags, I mean, who wouldn't want to play with the likes of Terry, Lampard, Kalou, Malouda, Welbeck, Phil Jones, Young, Erva & Giggs. We've got a promising team but lets face it..
Balotelli.. shit, diving ****,
Dzeko.. crap,
Barry.. twat,
Clichy.. French, shit,
Milner.. face like a fucking tomataaa...
Wonder if that twats been twatted yet ;)
pudge said:*Insert not sure if serious picture*MSP said:pudge said:What? Your initial post didn't make sense (or was a pathetic joke I'm not sure yet),
Plus, who's to say Hazard won't be playing at a high level at the age of 36 say? Look at Giggs and Scholes
well, if you think that Giggs and Scholes are playing at top level, specially first one, than it's cool..