Eden Hazard (continued)

[vincent]

I don't know if you have trouble reading, but I said at Swansea, Stoke, Arsenal, Everton, West Brom and Sunderland

Now now you're being slightly bitter don't you think.

How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.

Interesting that the majority of reds I know who have season tickets have said Uniteds front line (with the exception of Rooney) and midfield is extremely poor and not in the same class as Citys. They're amazed United kept pace with City all season long.

 

[Red_fan]

Now now you're being slightly bitter don't you think.

How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.

Interesting that the majority of reds I know who have season tickets have said Uniteds front line (with the exception of Rooney) and midfield is extremely poor and not in the same class as Citys. They're amazed United kept pace with City all season long.

Well different people have different perceptions of things don't they?

The fact is that the United attack yielded near identical results to the City attack throughout the whole season.

 

[Danamy]

How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.

The game that was given was because Hazard was there

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

 

[Red_fan]

The game that was given was because Hazard was there

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.

 

[tonea2003]

How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.

Interesting that the majority of reds I know who have season tickets have said Uniteds front line (with the exception of Rooney) and midfield is extremely poor and not in the same class as Citys. They're amazed United kept pace with City all season long.

Well different people have different perceptions of things don't they?

The fact is that the United attack yielded near identical results to the City attack throughout the whole season.

but not when it really mattered
wigan away and us away you came up short
think that is the difference

 

[richards30]

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.

fuck off back to sad cafe then!!!

 

[michael1991]

why won't this rag just go and f##k off our city forum, no one wants you here :) jog along now

 

[Danamy]

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a CD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.

That's exactly what it is HISTORY, we're talking.................

 

[allan harper]

The game that was given was because Hazard was there

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

Heard anything about Bale mate or any other signings ?

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.

Do you pronounce it as istree now?