Eden Hazard (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
 
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.


So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
 
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
The same could be said about bringing up the games we played poorly in.
 
Red_fan said:
SWP's back said:
As if the last 20 years actually matter when he would be joining the current team in the current situation.

You sound like a scouser
I guess the fact that I was joking went right over your head then, yeah?
It's a dvd of the next twenty years you need to worry about coz you won't figure in it all that often.
 
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.

Sorry - why the f*ck are you on this forum - I wouldn't be seen dead on any Rag forum no matter what they were talking about.

I expect if i did I'd probably get a lot more abuse than you are being given
 
jonmcity said:
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.


So do you honestly think he is coming to you?

Absolutely no idea mate. It seems like Eden Hazard is the only one that knows that.

Some signs look good. IMO he would have more chance of playing in his preferred position with us (and more regularly) and we do have the Ronaldo factor. It must surely be a massive attraction for Hazard to see how we developed Ronaldo the way we did. And then there are a couple of reports in France that he's leaning towards us, and Sky reported the same thing. On the other hand it's likely that City and Chelsea will have offered significantly more money.

As I said though, I have no idea where he'll end up, completely up in the air.
 
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.

I'll hold me hands up and if baiting is a crime then put me in the dock now.

I've suffered enough of it in the past so get used to it, i've got loads in the bank i need to repay.

No apologies from me i'm afraid.............
 
jonmcity said:
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.


So do you honestly think he is coming to you?

He would fit in both sides. Playing behind Rooney or playing behind Aguero for us. If he joins us I do think Nasri's game time will be more limited though. But hazard Silva and Yaya supporting Aguero sounds good for us!

Oh you were asking the United fan haha my bad.
 
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
It was significant, just like the other 37 games.

I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
The same could be said about bringing up the games we played poorly in.

That was just a retort to the claim that the City attack is way better than ours. There was no baiting there.

Seriously, can we just move on from this petty squabbling and talk about Eden Hazard?
 
In addition to telling his suitors that he wants to play a specific position, he's now suggesting he wants the number 10 shirt too wherever he goes ("I have always dreamed of playing the number 10 role, and wearing that number on my back."). I wonder if he'll want a say in his destination club's transfer policy next. Anyway...

Dzeko is our #10
Shrek is their #10
Mata is Chelsea's #10
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.