Eden Hazard (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OB1 said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
This latest so-called 'development' is the most bizarre yet.

To allow a player to announce his transfer on Twitter, says more about Hazard and the games he appears to have played for nigh on ten days.

Neither City or United would allow this direction.

24 hours ago he was nailed on according to 'L'Equipe to have chosen United.

City have long made their stance clear to his agent.

Your faith waning then?


It's not a question of faith, just an example that many 'respected' outlets have attempted to give a definitive conclusion over the last week.

It has always been the case City made an offer and would not bend to other demands.

All this latest should be treated with the same amount of caution as everything else in recent days, until he finally puts up.
 
C_T_I_D said:
zola said:
C_T_I_D said:
Hulk - Torres - Hazard.

Not bad but not premiership winning material either!


Not with just three players but with ;

-----Mata---
Ramires---Lampard
Ivanovic -Terry - Cahill - Cole
---Cech---

behind them it certainly is.

You're backing two players to help pick up the distance between City and Chelsea?

Two players, a manager playing a formation thats suits, as well as having the backing of the squad... Possibly.
 
C_T_I_D said:
Hulk - Torres - Hazard.

Not bad but not premiership winning material either!

That may look good on paper but what happens on the pitch could and sometimes usually never lives up to the bill.
 
Chelsea probably was the only club who would let him announce it over twitter that's why he chose Chelsea
 
brian the blue said:
Christ he isn't half milking this transfer. It wouldn't surprise me if we're none the wiser about this transfer this time next week.

If he goes to Chelea then so be it. He looks a quality player but there are plenty of other options out there, and to be honest, i'd rather we address our central midfield/defence first as those are the positions we lack cover in.

Be interesting to see whats going with Chelsea though, is Roman going to sign who he wants and then appoint Di Matteo? Surey no manager would take the job when the owner is signing the players. Unless, of course, they've found a new manager and he's involved in this transfer also.

Roman is doing Chelsea signings for years, where have you been?

Who else signed Torres?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
This latest so-called 'development' is the most bizarre yet.

To allow a player to announce his transfer on Twitter, says more about Hazard and the games he appears to have played for nigh on ten days.

Neither City or United would allow this direction.

24 hours ago he was nailed on according to 'L'Equipe to have chosen United.

City have long made their stance clear to his agent.
Could city have given him an ultimatum sign up or we move on?
 
SWP's back said:
If and it's a bif IF, he goes to Chelsea then it's one in the eye for those that were supporting Chelsea in the final. I said we shouldnt.


Still worth it for the LOLs at Spurs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.