Really? How did he have a good chance to save either?Pretty questionable for both goals if you ask me
That's a bit harsh I feel, particularly as one took a deflection.Pretty questionable for both goals if you ask me
Pretty questionable for both goals if you ask me
He should have saved both goals. The first was not far and hit the ground before passing the line, while the second ball passed under his hand. An excellent goalkeeper should have saved both.Really? How did he have a good chance to save either?
Unsighted for the first and the second took a deflection, other wise he would have likely easily saved it.
I feel bad for Eddie as most of the chances we concede are very high quality (from xG perspective) so he has very little chance of saving most of them.
you obviously haven't got a fucking clue what your talking about,wibblePretty questionable for both goals if you ask me
Boggles the mind, these arguments for him being partially at fault for today’s loss.Christ, it's Ederson now.........blimey, no one's getting off this week.
He should have saved both goals. The first was not far and hit the ground before passing the line, while the second ball passed under his hand. An excellent goalkeeper should have saved both.
How many times did we concede a goal from the first chance? Or two from the first two?
The goalkeeper is the most important player, and I think Ederson is not a top one. He is the best passer but not the best goalkeeper.