Edin Dzeko

pudge said:
salfordblues said:
pudge said:
How is bringing him on in injury time an insult or disrespectful?

He was brought on to get a goal and he almost did.

Because if it was a meaningful attempt to win the game then he should have been on at least 10 minutes earlier. Balotelli didn't show anything all afternoon.
So the substitution wasn't an attempt to get a goal/win the game?

The amount of time given to a player shows intent. 3 minutes is a piss take given how poor Balotelli was today, and taking into consideration Dzeko's run of late.

One back heel to Tevez hardly qualifies as a good game. So yes, Dzeko threatened more in 3 minutes than Mario did in 90.

When did Balotelli have a decent game last? In the Euro's?
 
MSP said:
injury time subs should be only the ones when you're wasting time or you just conceded a goal and need anything..

to wait til 90th minute to make last sub when you are not winning against much weaker team is strange at least.
Like say, a goal?<br /><br />-- Sep 15th, '12, 19:59 --<br /><br />
Comrade Buka said:
pudge said:
salfordblues said:
Because if it was a meaningful attempt to win the game then he should have been on at least 10 minutes earlier. Balotelli didn't show anything all afternoon.
So the substitution wasn't an attempt to get a goal/win the game?

The amount of time given to a player shows intent. 3 minutes is a piss take given how poor Balotelli was today, and taking into consideration Dzeko's run of late.

One back heel to Tevez hardly qualifies as a good game. So yes, Dzeko threatened more in 3 minutes than Mario did in 90.

When did Balotelli have a decent game last? In the Euro's?
Dzeko had as many shots on target as Mario so I fail to see how he threatened more.

No hypothetical situation "think what he would have done if he had been given 20 minutes" because he wasn't and you can't predict his performance.

The team on the pitch, prior to Dzeko coming on was good enough to win/get a goal. Then as a last resort he brought Edin on, it's not disrespectful.

This is disrespectful..
sep28_tevez_dzeko.jpg
 
I like edin dzeko this time last year he was brilliant.I think mancini should play him more.
 
The hysteria has started then. If he starts against Real Madrid with Mario on the bench ("rotation" is the football terminology) will you all wipe your tears and issue an apology to our fully qualified manager?
 
pudge said:
MSP said:
injury time subs should be only the ones when you're wasting time or you just conceded a goal and need anything..

to wait til 90th minute to make last sub when you are not winning against much weaker team is strange at least.
Like say, a goal?

If you are going to put things completely out of context, perhaps you should try a little better than that.
 
Comrade Buka said:
pudge said:
MSP said:
injury time subs should be only the ones when you're wasting time or you just conceded a goal and need anything..

to wait til 90th minute to make last sub when you are not winning against much weaker team is strange at least.
Like say, a goal?

If you are going to put things completely out of context, perhaps you should try a little better than that.
How's it out of context?
 
That goal was needed much before and it's not like it suddenly became needed in 90th minute. It was extremely stupid way to do that last sub and it's extremely hard to understand what the hell are you trying to say here :)

Anyway, I'm done with this discussion.. don't have time for you at the moment
 
MSP said:
That goal was needed much before and it's not like it suddenly became needed in 90th minute. It was extremely stupid way to do that last sub and it's extremely hard to understand what the hell are you trying to say here :)

Anyway, I'm done with this discussion.. don't have time for you at the moment
You said injury time subs should happen when you just need anything.

Like a goal.

Hence why Dzeko was brought on. The team prior to his arrival was good enough to get a goal.
 
pudge said:
MSP said:
injury time subs should be only the ones when you're wasting time or you just conceded a goal and need anything..

to wait til 90th minute to make last sub when you are not winning against much weaker team is strange at least.
Like say, a goal?

-- Sep 15th, '12, 19:59 --

Comrade Buka said:
pudge said:
So the substitution wasn't an attempt to get a goal/win the game?

The amount of time given to a player shows intent. 3 minutes is a piss take given how poor Balotelli was today, and taking into consideration Dzeko's run of late.

One back heel to Tevez hardly qualifies as a good game. So yes, Dzeko threatened more in 3 minutes than Mario did in 90.

When did Balotelli have a decent game last? In the Euro's?
Dzeko had as many shots on target as Mario so I fail to see how he threatened more.

No hypothetical situation "think what he would have done if he had been given 20 minutes" because he wasn't and you can't predict his performance.

The team on the pitch, prior to Dzeko coming on was good enough to win/get a goal. Then as a last resort he brought Edin on, it's not disrespectful.

This is disrespectful..
sep28_tevez_dzeko.jpg

Your lack of logic is appalling.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.