Emergency keeper loan / Hart / Brum [All merged]

What are you people getting at? Are you saying City cannot insist that Hart return but Hart can insist and hasn't?
 
However, City's attempts to recall Hart from St Andrew's ended amid shambolic scenes shortly after 9pm as the Premier League rendered hours of wrangling over compensation a total irrelevance.

City were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham as - after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees - they were shocked by the Midlands club's demands.
Birmingham wanted City to pay £800,000 for every league position they dropped between now and the end of the season and compensate them for any season ticket revenue they lost ahead of next year as a result of slipping down the table.
Birmingham also demanded a further £250,000 if City finished in the Champions League places.


Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1269333/Birmingham-goalkeeper-Joe-Harts-return-Manchester-City-blocked.html#ixzz0mLNeK2J5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0mLNeK2J5</a>
 
Stevies Bald Head! said:
gunnar neilson is our lady luck..

we never do it the easy way, i can feel this only going one way, for the good.

have faith blues, i have that strange gut feeling that this is indeed what was meant to be.


I can see where your coming from.

The beautiful irony of a freebie propelling city to a chimps league place would add to the story of our club.
 
I think Birmingham with their demands have fucked up any chance of having Hart on loan again next season.
 
UlsterCitizen said:
However, City's attempts to recall Hart from St Andrew's ended amid shambolic scenes shortly after 9pm as the Premier League rendered hours of wrangling over compensation a total irrelevance.

City were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham as - after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees - they were shocked by the Midlands club's demands.
Birmingham wanted City to pay £800,000 for every league position they dropped between now and the end of the season and compensate them for any season ticket revenue they lost ahead of next year as a result of slipping down the table.
Birmingham also demanded a further £250,000 if City finished in the Champions League places.


Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1269333/Birmingham-goalkeeper-Joe-Harts-return-Manchester-City-blocked.html#ixzz0mLNeK2J5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0mLNeK2J5</a>

OH FFS
 
mat said:
Stevies Bald Head! said:
gunnar neilson is our lady luck..

we never do it the easy way, i can feel this only going one way, for the good.

have faith blues, i have that strange gut feeling that this is indeed what was meant to be.


I can see where your coming from.

The beautiful irony of a freebie propelling city to a chimps league place would add to the story of our club.

It's written in the scripts.

Other clubs think they have that advantage, that 'no way are they going to be able to do it' attitude.

Bollocks I say, this is the fortune we blues need.

Neilson is the dark knight, the cat amongst the pidgeons.

4th will be ours, have the faith!
 
Immaculate Pasta said:
I think Birmingham with their demands have fucked up any chance of having Hart on loan again next season.

Hopefully Bobby will charm him into being our number next season with the double whammy of champs league and Englands new Number 1 for Euro qualifiers.
 
Pam said:
UlsterCitizen said:
However, City's attempts to recall Hart from St Andrew's ended amid shambolic scenes shortly after 9pm as the Premier League rendered hours of wrangling over compensation a total irrelevance.

City were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham as - after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees - they were shocked by the Midlands club's demands.
Birmingham wanted City to pay £800,000 for every league position they dropped between now and the end of the season and compensate them for any season ticket revenue they lost ahead of next year as a result of slipping down the table.
Birmingham also demanded a further £250,000 if City finished in the Champions League places.


Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1269333/Birmingham-goalkeeper-Joe-Harts-return-Manchester-City-blocked.html#ixzz0mLNeK2J5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0mLNeK2J5</a>

OH FFS

Not sure how true that is, how would Birmingham work out the 'lost revenue' from season tickets if they slip down the table?
 
Pam said:
What are you people getting at? Are you saying City cannot insist that Hart return but Hart can insist and hasn't?

City certainly couldn't insist on it, season long loans cannot have recall clauses, and the only way the player can return is if the club that hold his registration send him back.

Hart could have told Birmingham he wanted to come back, and then they could have allowed it if they wanted to (got enough compensation), since it seems that the PL would have agreed.

Who knows ? My feeling though is that Hart doesn't want to come back here.<br /><br />-- Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:02 am --<br /><br />
Pam said:
UlsterCitizen said:
However, City's attempts to recall Hart from St Andrew's ended amid shambolic scenes shortly after 9pm as the Premier League rendered hours of wrangling over compensation a total irrelevance.

City were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham as - after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees - they were shocked by the Midlands club's demands.
Birmingham wanted City to pay £800,000 for every league position they dropped between now and the end of the season and compensate them for any season ticket revenue they lost ahead of next year as a result of slipping down the table.
Birmingham also demanded a further £250,000 if City finished in the Champions League places.


Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1269333/Birmingham-goalkeeper-Joe-Harts-return-Manchester-City-blocked.html#ixzz0mLNeK2J5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0mLNeK2J5</a>

OH FFS

Its from the Daily Mail, doesn't mean its true.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.