England v Denmark | Euro 2020 Semi Final

What will the result be?


  • Total voters
    282
  • Poll closed .
You fail to post videos in support of your view and continue to attack me without reason on a purely subjective point of view whereas I've stated that I'm open to reassessment of the Kane incident save that there's no slow motion replay of this.

So, I must conclude - WTF?!?!?!?!

You seem to be - sorry to say - a fucking asshole. Unwilling to engage in simple debate - overconfident in your own biased opinion - and unwilling to back said opinion up with evidence in spite of the fact that I've stated numerous times that I'm open to discussion.

Here's a final thought... fuck you!
Attack you? Biased opinion?

You just spewed a load of accusations about me not backing up my claims, I told you I was at work, I posted earlier from a layby at the side of the road off my phone whilst on a tacho break.

Now you call me an asshole lol

No denial about being that other thundercunt though.
 
Won’t be supporting, but telling everyone on here they’re not supporting.

The height of attention seeking!

“LOOK AT ME, I DON’T SUPPORT ENGLAND BECAUSE IT’S A BIT ALTERNATIVE NOT TO SUPPORT ENGLAND AND I WANT TO BE SEEN AS DEAD COOL… LOOK… NO, LOOK AT ME!”
The truth is somewhere down the middle
 
A poor decision
I thought so too.
Poor man management.
The team management/formation change can be argued about as correct or not, but I thought someone else could have been brought off if that was what he wanted. Keep fresh players on and take off someone who has already run their lungs out.
 
Attack you? Biased opinion?

You just spewed a load of accusations about me not backing up my claims, I told you I was at work, I posted earlier from a layby at the side of the road off my phone whilst on a tacho break.

Now you call me an asshole lol

No denial about being that other thundercunt though.
I think it best that we put each other on ignore. I went out of my way to engage in rational discussion based on reexamination of game footage - and indeed I reviewed footage and rewatched the Kane incident to insure that I hadn't missed something - out of respect for your opinion.

Having gone out of my way to supply posts in support of my view -and having done the extra mile to review game footage of the Kane incident where I could not find any replay evidence - and then having invited evidence-based rebuttal - what do I get from you?

Abuse.

So, welcome, Bluealf - you've achieved the distinction of being the first and only - so far - member of Bluemoon on my ignore list.

Why? Not because I disagree with you - hell I disagree with Bigga far, far more - but he's not on my ignore list.

Why? Because you revert to insults as a means of rebuttal - incapable or unwilling to post thoughtful responses.
 
I think it best that we put each other on ignore. I went out of my way to engage in rational discussion based on reexamination of game footage - and indeed I reviewed footage and rewatched the Kane incident to insure that I hadn't missed something - out of respect for your opinion.

Having gone out of my way to supply posts in support of my view -and having done the extra mile to review game footage of the Kane incident where I could not find any replay evidence - and then having invited evidence-based rebuttal - what do I get from you?

Abuse.

So, welcome, Bluealf - you've achieved the distinction of being the first and only - so far - member of Bluemoon on my ignore list.

Why? Not because I disagree with you - hell I disagree with Bigga far, far more - but he's not on my ignore list.

Why? Because you revert to insults as a means of rebuttal - incapable or unwilling to post thoughtful responses.
You stay in your fantasy land, I never swore or called you an asshole.

You continually refused to answer if you had even seen Kane kick the defender.

So, again if you can't see Kane kick the defender, it was pointless to continue but as of now you have said you can't even see Kane kick the defender then you are blind as fuck, I said this earlier far nicer and said good day to you, you then called me out for not supplying video footage, I told you I was at work, you then call me an asshole.

And you put me on ignore lol

Cya later Washington you utter gimp.
 
Mostly agree.

But, if given any contact in the penalty box - then going down - is that diving? Or is going down absolutely called for as a team player?

I don't think he dived, I went into it in greater detail in another post.

It happens though and players have been doing it since football began. Remember good old Franny Lee? Well he wasn't the only one. When players stay on their feet and are kicked and pushed in what is a clear penalty that isn't given, you can't blame them in taking the 50/50 option and going down
 
I don't think he dived, I went into it in greater detail in another post.

It happens though and players have been doing it since football began. Remember good old Franny Lee? Well he wasn't the only one. When players stay on their feet and are kicked and pushed in what is a clear penalty that isn't given, you can't blame them in taking the 50/50 option and going down
Cheers - and I agree with you. Sterling going down in Demark's box - not at all a dive since contact obviously occured.

At the same time, the contact wasn't sufficient to merit a penalty - not even close IMO.

Maybe the Sterling penalty call was a makeup for the Kane incident earlier - who knows?

Anyhow, England were the better side - and advanced.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.