They will dine out on their we won them 0-0 in the group stage for years if we win it.
Bitter cunts.
They will dine out on their we won them 0-0 in the group stage for years if we win it.
Attack you? Biased opinion?You fail to post videos in support of your view and continue to attack me without reason on a purely subjective point of view whereas I've stated that I'm open to reassessment of the Kane incident save that there's no slow motion replay of this.
So, I must conclude - WTF?!?!?!?!
You seem to be - sorry to say - a fucking asshole. Unwilling to engage in simple debate - overconfident in your own biased opinion - and unwilling to back said opinion up with evidence in spite of the fact that I've stated numerous times that I'm open to discussion.
Here's a final thought... fuck you!
The truth is somewhere down the middleWon’t be supporting, but telling everyone on here they’re not supporting.
The height of attention seeking!
“LOOK AT ME, I DON’T SUPPORT ENGLAND BECAUSE IT’S A BIT ALTERNATIVE NOT TO SUPPORT ENGLAND AND I WANT TO BE SEEN AS DEAD COOL… LOOK… NO, LOOK AT ME!”
I thought so too.A poor decision
I think it best that we put each other on ignore. I went out of my way to engage in rational discussion based on reexamination of game footage - and indeed I reviewed footage and rewatched the Kane incident to insure that I hadn't missed something - out of respect for your opinion.Attack you? Biased opinion?
You just spewed a load of accusations about me not backing up my claims, I told you I was at work, I posted earlier from a layby at the side of the road off my phone whilst on a tacho break.
Now you call me an asshole lol
No denial about being that other thundercunt though.
You stay in your fantasy land, I never swore or called you an asshole.I think it best that we put each other on ignore. I went out of my way to engage in rational discussion based on reexamination of game footage - and indeed I reviewed footage and rewatched the Kane incident to insure that I hadn't missed something - out of respect for your opinion.
Having gone out of my way to supply posts in support of my view -and having done the extra mile to review game footage of the Kane incident where I could not find any replay evidence - and then having invited evidence-based rebuttal - what do I get from you?
Abuse.
So, welcome, Bluealf - you've achieved the distinction of being the first and only - so far - member of Bluemoon on my ignore list.
Why? Not because I disagree with you - hell I disagree with Bigga far, far more - but he's not on my ignore list.
Why? Because you revert to insults as a means of rebuttal - incapable or unwilling to post thoughtful responses.
Liam has spoken.
Mostly agree.
But, if given any contact in the penalty box - then going down - is that diving? Or is going down absolutely called for as a team player?
Cheers - and I agree with you. Sterling going down in Demark's box - not at all a dive since contact obviously occured.I don't think he dived, I went into it in greater detail in another post.
It happens though and players have been doing it since football began. Remember good old Franny Lee? Well he wasn't the only one. When players stay on their feet and are kicked and pushed in what is a clear penalty that isn't given, you can't blame them in taking the 50/50 option and going down