lee one pen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2012
- Messages
- 924
He can't have been offered £100k a week Surley. If he was then that is Utter madness, they will be in receivership within 5 years.think that is still 50k a week
He can't have been offered £100k a week Surley. If he was then that is Utter madness, they will be in receivership within 5 years.think that is still 50k a week
He can't have been offered £100k a week Surley. If he was then that is Utter madness, they will be in receivership within 5 years.
Free transfer, so his contract will reflect that, but agree, utter madness.He can't have been offered £100k a week Surley. If he was then that is Utter madness, they will be in receivership within 5 years.
Thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't aware of that ruling.He didn't because he wasn't entitled to, as a youth player. And wherever he goes, we will still get a nominal fee for him, as part of the youth academy compensation.
A very nominal fee at that given he's moving between associations and was only with us for 4 years. Good luck to the lad, I suspect he's going to need it there.He didn't because he wasn't entitled to, as a youth player. And wherever he goes, we will still get a nominal fee for him, as part of the youth academy compensation.
oh dear oh dear.